Literature DB >> 11163814

Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

M Fluker1, J Grifo, A Leader, M Levy, D Meldrum, S J Muasher, J Rinehart, Z Rosenwaks, R T Scott, W Schoolcraft, D B Shapiro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and local tolerance of ganirelix acetate for the inhibition of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
DESIGN: Phase III, multicenter, open-label randomized trial.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization (IVF) centers in North America. PATIENT(S): Healthy female partners (n = 313) in subfertile couples for whom COH and IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were indicated. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to receive one COH cycle with ganirelix or the reference treatment, a long protocol of leuprolide acetate in conjunction with follitropin-beta for injection. OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rates, endocrine variables, and safety variables. RESULT(S): The mean number of oocytes retrieved per attempt was 11.6 in the ganirelix group and 14.1 in the leuprolide group. Fertilization rates were 62.4% and 61.9% in the ganirelix and leuprolide groups, respectively, and implantation rates were 21.1% and 26.1%. Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 35.4% and 30.8% in the ganirelix group and 38.4% and 36.4% in the leuprolide acetate group. Fewer moderate and severe injection site reactions were reported with ganirelix (11.9% and 0.6%) than with leuprolide (24.4% and 1.1%). CONCLUSION(S): Ganirelix is effective, safe, and well tolerated. Compared with leuprolide acetate, ganirelix therapy has a shorter duration and fewer injections but produces a similar pregnancy rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11163814     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01638-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  26 in total

1.  Optimized hormonal stimulation is critical for production of viable embryos and establishment of subsequent implantation.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Alfred Robichaud; Sylvie Nadeau; Rejean Savoie; Bernard Gallant; Rodney J Ouellette
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Outcome of frozen-thawed blastocysts derived from gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist or antagonist cycles.

Authors:  Robert Medved; Irma Virant-Klun; Helena Meden-Vrtovec; Tomaz Tomazevic
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The effects of GnRH antagonist on the endometrium of normally menstruating women.

Authors:  Porntip Sirayapiwat; Somchai Suwajanakorn; Surang Triratanachat; Somchai Niruthisard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  GnRH antagonists may affect endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Beth W Rackow; Harvey J Kliman; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Association between the proportion of dominant follicles and oocyte developmental competence.

Authors:  Yi Li; Rui-Qi Li; Song-Bang Ou; Ling Ren; Ning-Feng Zhang; Li-Na Wei; Qing-Xue Zhang; Dong-Zi Yang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  The state of "freeze-for-all" in human ARTs.

Authors:  Natalia Basile; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  [Effects of cetrorelix versus ganirelix in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges and on clinical outcomes of IVF-ET cycles].

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Xingyu Zhou; Yingxue Chen; Qingyan Zhang; Ying Li; Jing Zhe; Xin Chen; Shiling Chen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-10-30

Review 8.  Contemporary pharmacological manipulation in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Judith A F Huirne; Cornelis B Lambalk; Andre C D van Loenen; Roel Schats; Peter G A Hompes; Bart C J M Fauser; Nick S Macklon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive techniques: are there clinical differences between agents?

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Ricardo E Felberbaum; Askan Schultze-Mosgau; Klaus Diedrich
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Comparison of the ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-antagonist protocol with microdose flare -up protocol in poor responders: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Bülent Berker; Candan İltemir Duvan; Cemil Kaya; Ruşen Aytaç; Hakan Satıroğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.