OBJECTIVE: The direct calculation of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) as the difference between mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure (ICP) produces a number which does not always adequately describe conditions for brain perfusion. A non-invasive method of CPP measurement has previously been reported based on waveform analysis of blood flow velocity measured in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) by transcranial Doppler. This study describes the results of clinical tests of the prototype bilateral transcranial Doppler based apparatus for non-invasive CPP measurement (nCPP). METHODS: Twenty five consecutive, paralysed, sedated, and ventilated patients with head injury were studied. Intracranial pressure (ICP) and arterial blood pressure (ABP) were monitored continuously. The left and right MCAs were insonated daily (108 measurements) using a purpose built transcranial Doppler monitor (Neuro Q(TM), Deltex Ltd, Chichester, UK) with software capable of the non-invasive estimation of CPP. Time averaged values of mean and diastolic flow velocities (FVm, FVd) and ABP were calculated. nCPP was then computed as: ABPxFVd/FVm+14. RESULTS: The absolute difference between real CPP and nCPP (daily averages) was less than 10 mm Hg in 89% of measurements and less than 13 mm Hg in 92% of measurements. The 95% confidence range for predictors was no wider than +/-12 mm Hg (n=25) for the CPP, varying from 70 to 95 mm Hg. The absolute value of side to side differences in nCPP was significantly greater (p<0.05) when CT based evidence of brain swelling was present and was also positively correlated (p<0.05) with mean ICP. CONCLUSION: The device is of potential benefit for intermittent or continuous monitoring of brain perfusion pressure in situations where the direct measurement is not available or its reliability is in question.
OBJECTIVE: The direct calculation of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) as the difference between mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure (ICP) produces a number which does not always adequately describe conditions for brain perfusion. A non-invasive method of CPP measurement has previously been reported based on waveform analysis of blood flow velocity measured in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) by transcranial Doppler. This study describes the results of clinical tests of the prototype bilateral transcranial Doppler based apparatus for non-invasive CPP measurement (nCPP). METHODS: Twenty five consecutive, paralysed, sedated, and ventilated patients with head injury were studied. Intracranial pressure (ICP) and arterial blood pressure (ABP) were monitored continuously. The left and right MCAs were insonated daily (108 measurements) using a purpose built transcranial Doppler monitor (Neuro Q(TM), Deltex Ltd, Chichester, UK) with software capable of the non-invasive estimation of CPP. Time averaged values of mean and diastolic flow velocities (FVm, FVd) and ABP were calculated. nCPP was then computed as: ABPxFVd/FVm+14. RESULTS: The absolute difference between real CPP and nCPP (daily averages) was less than 10 mm Hg in 89% of measurements and less than 13 mm Hg in 92% of measurements. The 95% confidence range for predictors was no wider than +/-12 mm Hg (n=25) for the CPP, varying from 70 to 95 mm Hg. The absolute value of side to side differences in nCPP was significantly greater (p<0.05) when CT based evidence of brain swelling was present and was also positively correlated (p<0.05) with mean ICP. CONCLUSION: The device is of potential benefit for intermittent or continuous monitoring of brain perfusion pressure in situations where the direct measurement is not available or its reliability is in question.
Authors: C Metz; M Holzschuh; T Bein; C Woertgen; R Rothoerl; B Kallenbach; K Taeger; A Brawanski Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: M Czosnyka; P Smielewski; S Piechnik; E A Schmidt; P G Al-Rawi; P J Kirkpatrick; J D Pickard Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Chiara Robba; Alberto Goffi; Thomas Geeraerts; Danilo Cardim; Gabriele Via; Marek Czosnyka; Soojin Park; Aarti Sarwal; Llewellyn Padayachy; Frank Rasulo; Giuseppe Citerio Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: C Robba; S Bacigaluppi; D Cardim; J Donnelly; M S Sekhon; M J Aries; G Mancardi; A Booth; N L Bragazzi; M Czosnyka; B Matta Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2015-09-05 Impact factor: 2.502