OBJECTIVES: To study associations between patterns of physical activity and ultrasound attenuation by the heel bone in men and women. DESIGN: Cross sectional, population based study. SETTING: Norfolk. PARTICIPANTS: 2296 men and 2914 women aged 45-74 registered with general practices participating in European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC Norfolk). RESULTS: Self reported time spent in high impact physical activity was strongly and positively associated with ultrasound attenuation by the heel bone, independently of age, weight, and other confounding factors. Men who reported participating in >/=2 hours/week of high impact activity had 8.44 dB/MHz (95% confidence interval 4.49 to 12.40) or 9.5%, higher ultrasound attenuation than men who reported no activity of this type. In women, the difference in ultrasound attenuation between those reporting any high impact activity and those reporting none was 2.41 dB/MHz (0.45 to 4.37) or 3.4% higher. In women this effect was similar in size to that of an age difference of four years. Moderate impact activity had no effect. However, climbing stairs was strongly independently associated with ultrasound attenuation in women (0.64 dB/MHz (0.19 to 1.09) for each additional five flights of stairs). There was a significant negative association in women between time spent watching television or video and heel bone ultrasound attenuation, which decreased by 0.08 dB/MHz (0.02 to 0.14) for each additional hour of viewing a week. CONCLUSIONS: High impact physical activity is independently associated with ultrasound attenuation by the heel bone in men and women. As low ultrasound attenuation has been shown to predict increased risk of hip fracture, interventions to promote participation in high impact activities may help preserve bone density and reduce the risk of fracture. However, in older people such interventions may be inappropriate as they could increase the likelihood of falls.
OBJECTIVES: To study associations between patterns of physical activity and ultrasound attenuation by the heel bone in men and women. DESIGN: Cross sectional, population based study. SETTING: Norfolk. PARTICIPANTS: 2296 men and 2914 women aged 45-74 registered with general practices participating in European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC Norfolk). RESULTS: Self reported time spent in high impact physical activity was strongly and positively associated with ultrasound attenuation by the heel bone, independently of age, weight, and other confounding factors. Men who reported participating in >/=2 hours/week of high impact activity had 8.44 dB/MHz (95% confidence interval 4.49 to 12.40) or 9.5%, higher ultrasound attenuation than men who reported no activity of this type. In women, the difference in ultrasound attenuation between those reporting any high impact activity and those reporting none was 2.41 dB/MHz (0.45 to 4.37) or 3.4% higher. In women this effect was similar in size to that of an age difference of four years. Moderate impact activity had no effect. However, climbing stairs was strongly independently associated with ultrasound attenuation in women (0.64 dB/MHz (0.19 to 1.09) for each additional five flights of stairs). There was a significant negative association in women between time spent watching television or video and heel bone ultrasound attenuation, which decreased by 0.08 dB/MHz (0.02 to 0.14) for each additional hour of viewing a week. CONCLUSIONS: High impact physical activity is independently associated with ultrasound attenuation by the heel bone in men and women. As low ultrasound attenuation has been shown to predict increased risk of hip fracture, interventions to promote participation in high impact activities may help preserve bone density and reduce the risk of fracture. However, in older people such interventions may be inappropriate as they could increase the likelihood of falls.
Authors: E V McCloskey; S A Murray; C Miller; D Charlesworth; W Tindale; D P O'Doherty; D R Bickerstaff; N A Hamdy; J A Kanis Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 1990-02 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-01-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Marga Lammert; Martin Kappler; Victor-Felix Mautner; Kurt Lammert; Stephan Störkel; Jan M Friedman; Derek Atkins Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-06-30 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: S Kaptoge; N Dalzell; R W Jakes; N Wareham; N E Day; K T Khaw; T J Beck; N Loveridge; J Reeve Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Margaret Ashwell; Elaine Stone; John Mathers; Stephen Barnes; Juliet Compston; Roger M Francis; Tim Key; Kevin D Cashman; Cyrus Cooper; Kay Tee Khaw; Susan Lanham-New; Helen Macdonald; Ann Prentice; Martin Shearer; Alison Stephen Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Kyriacos I Eleftheriou; Jaikirty S Rawal; Anthony Kehoe; Laurence E James; John R Payne; James R Skipworth; Zudin A Puthucheary; Fotios Drenos; Dudley J Pennell; Mike Loosemore; Michael World; Steve E Humphries; Fares S Haddad; Hugh E Montgomery Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-11-23
Authors: Stephen R Pye; Vinodh Devakumar; Steven Boonen; Herman Borghs; Dirk Vanderschueren; Judith E Adams; Kate A Ward; Gyorgy Bartfai; Felipe F Casanueva; Joseph D Finn; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S Han; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; Krzysztof Kula; Michael E J Lean; Neil Pendleton; Margus Punab; Alan J Silman; Frederick C W Wu; Terence W O'Neill Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.333