Literature DB >> 11158463

Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices.

S E Courtney1, K H Pyon, J G Saslow, G K Arnold, P B Pandit, R H Habib.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether lung volume changes and breathing pattern parameters differ among 3 devices for delivery of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in premature infants.
METHODS: Thirty-two premature infants receiving nasal CPAP for apnea or mild respiratory distress were enrolled. Birth weight was (mean +/- standard deviation) 1081 +/- 316 g, gestational age 29 +/- 2 weeks, age at study 13 +/- 12 days, and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) at study.29 +/-.1. Three devices, applied in random order, were studied in each infant: continuous flow nasal CPAP via CPAP prongs, continuous flow nasal CPAP via modified nasal cannula, and variable flow nasal CPAP. After lung recruitment to standardize volume history, changes in lung volume (DeltaV(L)) were assessed at nasal CPAP of 8, 6, 4, and 0 cm H(2)O using calibrated direct current-coupled respiratory inductance plethysmography.
RESULTS: DeltaV(L) was significantly greater overall with the variable flow device compared with both the nasal cannula and CPAP prongs. However, DeltaV(L) was not different between the cannula and the prongs. Respiratory rate, tidal volume, thoraco-abdominal asynchrony, and FIO(2) were greater with the modified cannula than for either of the other 2 devices.
CONCLUSION: Compared with 2 continuous flow devices, the variable flow nasal CPAP device leads to greater lung recruitment. Although a nasal cannula is able to recruit lung volume, it does so at the cost of increased respiratory effort and FIO(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11158463     DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.2.304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  21 in total

Review 1.  Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?

Authors:  A G De Paoli; C Morley; P G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates.

Authors:  A G De Paoli; C J Morley; P G Davis; R Lau; E Hingeley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Influence of three nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices on breathing pattern in preterm infants.

Authors:  Hocine Boumecid; Thameur Rakza; Abdel Abazine; Serge Klosowski; Régis Matran; Laurent Storme
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Efficacy of a low-cost bubble CPAP system in treatment of respiratory distress in a neonatal ward in Malawi.

Authors:  Kondwani Kawaza; Heather E Machen; Jocelyn Brown; Zondiwe Mwanza; Suzanne Iniguez; Al Gest; E O'Brian Smith; Maria Oden; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum; Elizabeth Molyneux
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.875

5.  A new device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: comparison with a standard nasal CPAP continuous positive airway pressure system.

Authors:  Daniele Trevisanuto; Nicoletta Grazzina; Nicoletta Doglioni; Paola Ferrarese; Francesco Marzari; Vincenzo Zanardo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Bubble vs conventional continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in preterm very low birth weight infants: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sucheta Yadav; Anu Thukral; M Jeeva Sankar; V Sreenivas; Ashok K Deorari; Vinod K Paul; Ramesh Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  F Sandri; G Ancora; A Lanzoni; P Tagliabue; M Colnaghi; M L Ventura; M Rinaldi; I Mondello; P Gancia; G P Salvioli; M Orzalesi; F Mosca
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 8.  Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions.

Authors:  Fernando C Barros; Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta; Maneesh Batra; Thomas N Hansen; Cesar G Victora; Craig E Rubens
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Comparison of two different CPAP systems by tidal breathing parameters.

Authors:  Thomas Hückstädt; Bertram Foitzik; Roland R Wauer; Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Effect of time and body position on ventilation in premature infants.

Authors:  Judith Hough; Anthony Trojman; Andreas Schibler
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.