Literature DB >> 11157689

Critical analysis of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator arrhythmia detection : results and technical considerations.

B L Wilkoff1, V Kühlkamp, K Volosin, K Ellenbogen, B Waldecker, S Kacet, J M Gillberg, C M DeSouza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the perceived benefits of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is the reduction in inappropriate therapy due to new detection algorithms. It was the purpose of the present investigation to propose methods to minimize bias during such comparisons and to report the arrhythmia detection clinical results of the PR Logic dual-chamber detection algorithm in the GEM DR ICD in the context of these methods. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between November 1997 and October 1998, 933 patients received the GEM DR ICD in this prospective multicenter study. A total of 4856 sustained arrhythmia episodes (n=311) with stored electrogram and marker channel were classified by the investigators; 3488 episodes (n=232) were ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), and 1368 episodes (n=149) were supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The overall detection results were corrected for multiple episodes within a patient with the generalized estimating equations (GEE) method with an exchangeable correlation structure between episodes. The relative sensitivity for detection of sustained VT and/or VF was 100.0% (3488 of 3488, n=232; 95% CI 98.3% to 100%), the VT/VF positive predictivity was 88.4% uncorrected (3488 of 3945, n=278) and 78.1% corrected (95% CI 73.3% to 82.3%) with the GEE method, and the SVT positive predictivity was 100.0% (911 of 911, n=101; 95% CI 96% to 100%).
CONCLUSIONS: A structured approach to analysis limits the bias inherent in the evaluation of tachycardia discrimination algorithms through the use of relative VT/VF sensitivity, VT/VF positive predictivity, and SVT positive predictivity along with corrections for multiple tachycardia episodes in a single patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157689     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.3.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  18 in total

1.  Use of "IEGM Online" in ICD patients--early detection of inappropriate classified ventricular tachycardia via home monitoring.

Authors:  Oliver Ritter; Wolfgang R Bauer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Case report: Delayed detection of ventricular tachycardia due to intradevice interactions by implantable atrio-ventricular pacer/cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Bharat K Kantharia; Farooq A Padder
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Differences in outcomes between patients treated with single- versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a substudy of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II.

Authors:  Loren D Berenbom; Brian C Weiford; James L Vacek; Martin P Emert; W Jackson Hall; Mark L Andrews; Scott McNitt; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  How to improve outcomes: should we put more emphasis on programming and medical care and less on patient selection?

Authors:  Laszlo Buga
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Methods for Assessment, Targets for Ventricular Rate during AF, and Clinical Relevance for Device Therapy.

Authors:  Shantanu Sarkar; Paul D Ziegler
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-06-30

6.  Single-brand dual-chamber discriminators to prevent inappropriate shocks in patients implanted with prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a propensity-weighted comparison of single- and dual-chamber devices.

Authors:  Sem Briongos-Figuero; Ana Sánchez; M Luisa Pérez; José B Martínez-Ferrer; Enrique García; Xavier Viñolas; Ángel Arenal; Javier Alzueta; Nuria Basterra; Aníbal Rodríguez; Ignacio Lozano; Roberto Muñoz-Aguilera
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  The role of remote monitoring in the reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies.

Authors:  J C J Res; D A M J Theuns; L Jordaens
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Algorithms for better arrhythmia discrimination in implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  R Schimpf; C Wolpert; B Lüderitz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Implantable CRT device diagnostics identify patients with increased risk for heart failure hospitalization.

Authors:  Giovanni B Perego; Maurizio Landolina; Giuseppe Vergara; Maurizio Lunati; Gabriele Zanotto; Alessia Pappone; Gabriele Lonardi; Giancarlo Speca; Saverio Iacopino; Annamaria Varbaro; Shantanu Sarkar; Doug A Hettrick; Alessandra Denaro
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Optimal Programming of ICDs for Prevention of Appropriate and Inappropriate Shocks.

Authors:  Ronald Lo; Amin Al-Ahmad; Henry Hsia; Paul C Zei; Paul J Wang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.