OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested that resting myocardial blood flow is within normal limits in most chronically dysfunctional left ventricular segments which improve function after coronary artery revascularisation (hibernating myocardium). The aim of this study was to assess myocardial blood flow and coronary vasodilator reserve in hibernating myocardium before and after coronary revascularisation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing coronary revascularisation (21 patients with bypass grafting and nine with coronary angioplasty), and 21 age and sex matched healthy volunteers (controls). Myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml/min/g) was measured by positron emission tomography using oxygen-15 water at rest and after dipyridamole (MBFdip, 0.56 mg/kg in four minutes). Coronary vasodilator reserve was calculated as MBFdip/MBF. Regional wall motion was assessed with echocardiography. RESULTS: Before revascularisation there were 48 remote and 275 dysfunctional myocardial segments, of which 163 (59%) improved function after revascularisation (hibernating). In hibernating segments coronary vasodilator reserve before revascularisation was significantly lower than in remote segments (1.97 (0.7), p < 0.0001) and controls (3.2 (1.5), p < 0.0001). In hibernating segments, myocardial blood flow remained unchanged after revascularisation (0.94 (0.3) v 0.95 (0.3) ml/min/g, p = 0.3) while coronary vasodilator reserve increased (1. 47 (0.7) v 1.98 (1.0), p < 0.0001). Myocardial blood flow was similar in remote, hibernating segments before and after revascularisation and in controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that myocardial blood flow at rest in hibernating myocardium is within normal limits in most segments, and that hibernating myocardium is characterised by an impaired coronary vasodilator reserve which improves significantly after coronary revascularisation.
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested that resting myocardial blood flow is within normal limits in most chronically dysfunctional left ventricular segments which improve function after coronary artery revascularisation (hibernating myocardium). The aim of this study was to assess myocardial blood flow and coronary vasodilator reserve in hibernating myocardium before and after coronary revascularisation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing coronary revascularisation (21 patients with bypass grafting and nine with coronary angioplasty), and 21 age and sex matched healthy volunteers (controls). Myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml/min/g) was measured by positron emission tomography using oxygen-15 water at rest and after dipyridamole (MBFdip, 0.56 mg/kg in four minutes). Coronary vasodilator reserve was calculated as MBFdip/MBF. Regional wall motion was assessed with echocardiography. RESULTS: Before revascularisation there were 48 remote and 275 dysfunctional myocardial segments, of which 163 (59%) improved function after revascularisation (hibernating). In hibernating segments coronary vasodilator reserve before revascularisation was significantly lower than in remote segments (1.97 (0.7), p < 0.0001) and controls (3.2 (1.5), p < 0.0001). In hibernating segments, myocardial blood flow remained unchanged after revascularisation (0.94 (0.3) v 0.95 (0.3) ml/min/g, p = 0.3) while coronary vasodilator reserve increased (1. 47 (0.7) v 1.98 (1.0), p < 0.0001). Myocardial blood flow was similar in remote, hibernating segments before and after revascularisation and in controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that myocardial blood flow at rest in hibernating myocardium is within normal limits in most segments, and that hibernating myocardium is characterised by an impaired coronary vasodilator reserve which improves significantly after coronary revascularisation.
Authors: G Sambuceti; O Parodi; C Marcassa; D Neglia; P Salvadori; A Giorgetti; R C Bellina; S Di Sacco; N Nista; P Marzullo Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1993-09-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: J L Vanoverschelde; W Wijns; C Depré; B Essamri; G R Heyndrickx; M Borgers; A Bol; J A Melin Journal: Circulation Date: 1993-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Czernin; P Müller; S Chan; R C Brunken; G Porenta; J Krivokapich; K Chen; A Chan; M E Phelps; H R Schelbert Journal: Circulation Date: 1993-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C Grandin; W Wijns; J A Melin; A Bol; A R Robert; G R Heyndrickx; C Michel; J L Vanoverschelde Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Anna S John; Marco Mongillo; Christophe Depre; Muhammad T Khan; Ornella E Rimoldi; John R Pepper; Gilles D Dreyfus; Dudley J Pennell; Paolo G Camici Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-07-28 Impact factor: 9.236