Literature DB >> 11156109

Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after failed coronary angioplasty: what has changed in a decade?

H Reinecke1, T Fetsch, N Roeder, C Schmid, A Winter, M Ribbing, E Berendes, M Block, H H Scheld, G Breithardt, S Kerber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of patient and procedural characteristics on the outcome after emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and temporal changes in these factors.
METHODS: Patients who underwent PTCA and subsequent emergency CABG were identified from the databases of the Departments of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery.
RESULTS: Two periods of clinical practice were compared. In 1989 to 1993, 2,880 PTCAs were performed, 64 patients underwent emergency CABG (2.3%), and 7 patients died (10.9%). During 1994 to 1998, 46 patients of 3,801 PTCAs underwent emergency CABG (1.2%, p < 0.01), and 7 patients died (15.2%, NS). The average rate of stenting increased from 0.8% to 24% in 1994 to 1998 as well as the frequency of arterial bypass grafts (0% vs 39%). In the latter period, patients were older, were more often females, had more cardiovascular risk factors, a higher Cleveland score (each p < 0.05), and suffered more often from periprocedural myocardial infarctions (p < 0.001) and nonfatal periprocedural complications (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the frequency of emergency CABG after failed PTCA declined, perioperative mortality tended to increase according to an unfavorable shift in patient risk factors and morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11156109     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02172-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous intervention: incidence and outcome.

Authors:  M G Gunning; I L Williams; D E Jewitt; A M Shah; R J Wainwright; M R Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention without onsite surgical backup.

Authors:  Gregory J Dehmer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Immediate rescue operations after failed diagnostic or therapeutic cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Sven M Almdahl; Terje Veel; Per Halvorsen; Stein E Rynning
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-10

4.  Postinfarct ventricular septal defect after coronary covered stent implantation.

Authors:  Soon Ho Chon; Young Hak Kim; Hyuck Kim; Won Sang Chung; Jeong Ho Kang; Kyung-Wook Shin
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-07

5.  Early and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Following Iatrogenic Injuries During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Alexander Verevkin; Konstantin von Aspern; Sergey Leontyev; Sven Lehmann; Michael A Borger; Piroze M Davierwala
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Current Report From the North-Rhine Westphalia Surgical Myocardial Infarction Registry.

Authors:  Matthias Thielmann; Daniel Wendt; Ingo Slottosch; Henryk Welp; Wolfgang Schiller; Konstantinos Tsagakis; Bastian Schmack; Alexander Weymann; Sven Martens; Markus Neuhäuser; Thorsten Wahlers; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Arjang Ruhparwar; Oliver-J Liakopoulos
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.