Literature DB >> 11154170

Patient outcomes related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.

M J Verhoef1, G M Van Rosendaal.   

Abstract

Although many aspects of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) have been addressed in the literature, attention to psychologic and social outcomes of PEG has been limited. Our goal was to assess a range of physical, psychologic, and social outcomes related to PEG feeding. This study is a follow-up survey of patients undergoing PEG and/or their surrogates. Data were collected by semistructured interviews in two tertiary hospitals in Alberta, Canada. Measurements consisted of PEG status at 1-year follow-up, quality of life, impact on caregivers, and opinions about long-term support via PEG. We included 71 patients in the study. Of all 39% of patients died, 32% had the PEG still in place, and for 28% the PEG was removed at the end of the 1-year follow-up. The prognosis of the attending physician at the initial visit and the underlying disease were significantly related to the outcome (p < 0.05). After 1 year, 85% of all patients whose PEGs were still in place, were not working or studying or managing their own household in any capacity, 67% were not managing personal care, and 19% were feeling very ill. Fifty-two percent of the caregivers spent 15 hours or more per week visiting and caring for the patient. At the 1-year follow-up, all ten surviving patients who could be interviewed agreed they would have a PEG again. Seventy percent of the caregivers said that they would want the same decision to be made. Although a majority of patients and caregivers did not regret the decision to place a PEG, this did not necessarily mean enhanced quality of life. Developing strategies to select patients who will benefit from long-term nutritional support could improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11154170     DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200101000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  10 in total

1.  Safety and caregiver satisfaction with gastrostomy in patients with Ataxia Telangiectasia.

Authors:  Maureen A Lefton-Greif; Thomas O Crawford; Sharon McGrath-Morrow; Kathryn A Carson; Howard M Lederman
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 4.123

2.  The development and validation of a quality-of-life questionnaire for head and neck cancer patients with enteral feeding tubes: the QOL-EF.

Authors:  Christiaan Seimeon Michael Stevens; Betty Lemon; Gina A Lockwood; John N Waldron; Andrea Bezjak; Jolie Ringash
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy After Cardiac Surgery: A Temporary Measure in a High-Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Jared P Beller; Daniel Phadke; Elizabeth D Krebs; William Z Chancellor; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Robert G Sawyer; Gorav Ailawadi; Leora T Yarboro
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer after prophylactic percutaneous-gastrostomy.

Authors:  Johannes Hausmann; Alica Kubesch; Carmen M Goettlich; Julia Rey; Astrid Wächtershäuser; Jörg Bojunga; Irina Blumenstein
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  A model for predicting gastrostomy tube placement in patients undergoing surgery for upper aerodigestive tract lesions.

Authors:  Ashley C Mays; Farah Moustafa; Mitch Worley; Joshua D Waltonen; Ralph D'Agostino
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Factors Associated with 30-Day Mortality in Patients after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy.

Authors:  Diego L Lima; Luiz Eduardo C Miranda; Marcel Rolland Ciro da Penha; Raquel N C L Lima; Dalmir Cavalcanti Dos Santos; Matheus Stillner Eufrânio; Ana Clara G Miranda; Leila Maria Moreira Beltrão Pereira
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Acceptability and outcomes of the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement--patients' and care givers' perspectives.

Authors:  Muhammad K Anis; Shahab Abid; Wasim Jafri; Zaigham Abbas; Hasnain A Shah; Saeed Hamid; Rozina Wasaya
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Patients' outcomes, adequacy and quality of information given to decision-makers and procedure acceptance.

Authors:  Petros Stathopoulos; George Karamanolis; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Dimitrios Polymeros; Angelos A Papadopoulos; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2011

9.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: Mortality and Risk Factors for Survival.

Authors:  Akin Onder; Murat Kapan; Zulfu Arikanoglu; Mesut Gul; Remzi Bestas; Yilmaz Palanci; Haktan Karaman; Bilsel Bac
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2012-01-20

10.  Patients' perspectives of living with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).

Authors:  Lena Martin; John Blomberg; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.067

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.