Literature DB >> 11154168

Clinical importance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in gastric cancer.

S Ishigami1, S Natsugoe, S Hokita, X Che, K Tokuda, A Nakajo, H Iwashige, M Tokushige, T Watanabe, S Takao, T Aikou.   

Abstract

Although serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 are commonly measured before surgery for gastric carcinoma, this clinical significance is not fully understood. We evaluated a total of 549 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. Levels of CEA and CA19-9 were measured preoperatively in all patients. We retrospectively analyzed correlations between CEA or CA19-9 and clinicopathologic features, and estimated the prognostic utility of the tumor markers by analyzing clinicopathologic characteristics of the carcinoma as a function of seropositivity or negativity of the antigens in combination or by raising the levels. The positivity rates of CEA (> or =5 ng/mL) and CA19-9 (> or =37 U/mL) were 19.5% and 18%, respectively. Serum CEA and CA19-9 positivity significantly correlated with depth of invasion, hepatic metastasis, and curativity. Forty-nine patients positive for both CEA and CA19-9 had significantly higher frequencies of lymph node metastasis, deeper invasion by the tumor, lower rates of curative resection (p < 0.01), and higher rates of hepatic metastasis (p < 0.05) than 377 patients with normal levels of CEA and CA19-9. Surgical outcomes of patients who were CEA- and CA19-9-positive were poorer than those of patients with normal CEA and CA19-9 levels (p < 0.01). Significant correlation was found between serum CEA and CA19-9 level (p < 0.001, r = 0.24). Doubling the threshold level of serum positivity to 10 ng/mL (CEA) and 74 U/mL (CA19-9) improved the prognostic value of these factors. However, multivariate analysis using Cox's hazards model revealed that only CEA positivity using the doubled threshold value (10 ng/mL) (p = 0.04, hazard ratio = 1.7), nodal involvement (p = 0.01, hazard ratio = 1.9), and depth of invasion (p = 0.02 hazard ratio = 1.5) significantly predicted prognosis. Carcinoembryonic antigen positivity using the doubled threshold level (10 ng/mL) was an important prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11154168     DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200101000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  39 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for treating liver metastasis from gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kakeji; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Titration of serum p53 antibodies in patients with gastric cancer: a single-institute study of 40 patients.

Authors:  Keiji Shimizu; Yuji Ueda; Hisakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  High level of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a poor survival predictor in gastric cancer.

Authors:  A Ra Choi; Jun Chul Park; Jie-Hyun Kim; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee; Jae Bock Chung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jiuchang Xiao; Xiaoyan He; Zengyan Wang; Jiying Hu; Fang Sun; Feng Qi; Shugang Yang; Zhenyu Xiao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02

Review 5.  Microarray analysis in gastric cancer: a review.

Authors:  Giovanna D'Angelo; Teresa Di Rienzo; Veronica Ojetti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Independently Predicts Disease-specific Survival in Resectable Gastroesophageal Junction and Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sam C Wang; Joanne F Chou; Vivian E Strong; Murray F Brennan; Marinela Capanu; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  False-positive findings for tumor markers after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takao Ohtsuka; Seiji Sato; Yoshihiko Kitajima; Masayuki Tanaka; Yuji Nakafusa; Kohji Miyazaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  New blood markers detection technology: A leap in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Maneesh K Beeharry; Wen-Tao Liu; Min Yan; Zheng-Gang Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ze-Bo Huang; Xin Zhou; Jun Xu; Yi-Ping Du; Wei Zhu; Jian Wang; Yong-Qian Shu; Ping Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10

10.  Identification of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and human neutrophil peptides 1-3 as potential biomarkers for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Mohri; T Mohri; W Wei; Y-J Qi; A Martin; C Miki; M Kusunoki; D G Ward; P J Johnson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.