Literature DB >> 24829865

Prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in gastric cancer.

Ze-Bo Huang1, Xin Zhou1, Jun Xu1, Yi-Ping Du1, Wei Zhu1, Jian Wang1, Yong-Qian Shu1, Ping Liu1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9, and CA50 in patients undergoing D2 resection.
METHODS: We evaluated 363 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy at our hospital from January 2006 to December 2009. Blood samples were obtained from each patient within 1 wk before surgery. The cut-off values for serum CEA, CA19-9, and CA50 were 5 ng/mL, 37 U/mL, and 20 U/mL, respectively. The correlation between preoperative tumor marker levels and prognosis was studied by means of univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: The preoperative serum positive rates of CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 were 24.0%, 18.9% and 24.5%, respectively. The positivity rate of serum CEA was significantly correlated with age (P < 0.001), sex (P = 0.022), tumor size (P = 0.007) and depth of invasion (P = 0.018); CA19-9 with tumor size (P = 0.042) and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001); and CA50 only with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, T category, N category, vascular or neural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. CA19-9 had an independent prognostic significance in patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.027).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 are prognostic in patients with gastric cancer. Only CA19-9 is an independent prognostic factor after surgery without adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer antigen 19-9; Cancer antigen 50; Carcinoembryonic antigen; Gastric cancer; Prognosis

Year:  2014        PMID: 24829865      PMCID: PMC4014790          DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2218-4333


  24 in total

1.  Role of serum tumor markers in monitoring for recurrence of gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Seok Reyol Choi; Jin Seok Jang; Jong Hun Lee; Myung Hwan Roh; Min Chan Kim; Won Sup Lee; Waqar Qureshi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The prognostic significance of preoperative serum CA 19-9 in patients with resectable gastric carcinoma: comparison with CEA.

Authors:  N Duraker; A N Celik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M J Gaspar; I Arribas; M C Coca; M Díez-Alonso
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

4.  A comparison of the clinical usefulness of CA 19-9 and CA 50 in the diagnosis and monitoring of gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  D Kokociñska; B Jarzab; R Król; K Ziaja; K Szejbak; S Kuśmierski
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.567

5.  Prognostic value of combination assays for CEA and CA 19-9 in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; H Oomori; N Koyanagi; M Mori; T Kamakura; S Minagawa; H Tateishi; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H J Wanebo; B Rao; C M Pinsky; R G Hoffman; M Stearns; M K Schwartz; H F Oettgen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence.

Authors:  I-Rue Lai; Wei-Jei Lee; Ming-Te Huang; Hshu-Hshing Lin
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

8.  Radioimmunometric assay for a monoclonal antibody-defined tumor marker, CA 19-9.

Authors:  B C Del Villano; S Brennan; P Brock; C Bucher; V Liu; M McClure; B Rake; S Space; B Westrick; H Schoemaker; V R Zurawski
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Prognostic factors in patients with diffuse type gastric cancer (linitis plastica) after operative treatment.

Authors:  M Schauer; M Peiper; J Theisen; W Knoefel
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.175

10.  Changes in serum and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen with growth of a human gastric cancer xenograft in nude mice.

Authors:  T Kiyama; M Onda; A Tokunaga; K Nishi; T Mizutani; T Yoshiyuki; Y Shimizu; N Matsukura; N Tanaka; G Asano
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1990-01
View more
  16 in total

1.  Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-De Hu; Yuan-Lan Huang; Bao-Dong Qin; Qing-Qin Tang; Min Yang; Ning Ma; Hai-Tao Fu; Ting-Ting Wei; Ren-Qian Zhong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-03

2.  MiR-101 inhibits cell growth and tumorigenesis of Helicobacter pylori related gastric cancer by repression of SOCS2.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhou; Yang Xia; Lin Li; Guoxin Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Usefulness of Preoperative Plasma Fibrinogen Versus Other Prognostic Markers for Predicting Gastric Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Masaaki Yamamoto; Yukinori Kurokawa; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  An Alternative Method for Screening Gastric Cancer Based on Serum Levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4.

Authors:  Junxiu Yu; Wanlei Zheng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-03

5.  Perioperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio changes plus CA199 in predicting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhao; Guoxin Mao; Yueyue Zhu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

6.  The characteristics of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in gastric cancer cases.

Authors:  Noriko Wada; Yukinori Kurokawa; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Differences and correlation of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Junxiu Yu; Shuguang Zhang; Bingbo Zhao
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

8.  Combined detection of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA242 improve prognostic prediction of surgically treated colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jingtao Wang; Xiao Wang; Fudong Yu; Jian Chen; Senlin Zhao; Dongyuan Zhang; Yang Yu; Xisheng Liu; Huamei Tang; Zhihai Peng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-11-01

9.  Combination of tumor markers predicts progression and pathological response in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Zining Liu; Yinkui Wang; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Yan Zhang; Shuangxi Li; Yongning Jia; Rulin Miao; Kan Xue; Zhemin Li; Ziyu Li; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Value of Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yong-xi Song; Xuan-zhang Huang; Peng Gao; Jing-xu Sun; Xiao-wan Chen; Yu-chong Yang; Cong Zhang; Hong-peng Liu; Hong-chi Wang; Zhen-ning Wang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.