Literature DB >> 11151667

Selection on worker honeybee responses to queen pheromone (Apis mellifera L.).

T Pankiw1, M L Winston, M K Fondrk, K N Slessor.   

Abstract

Disruptive selection for responsiveness to queen mandibular gland pheromone (QMP) in the retinue bioassay resulted in the production of high and low QMP responding strains of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Strains differed significantly in their retinue response to QMP after one generation of selection. By the third generation the high strain was on average at least nine times more responsive than the low strain. The strains showed seasonal phenotypic plasticity such that both strains were more responsive to the pheromone in the spring than in the fall. Directional selection for low seasonal variation indicated that phenotypic plasticity was an additional genetic component to retinue response to QMP. Selection for high and low retinue responsiveness to QMP was not an artifact of the synthetic blend because both strains were equally responsive or non-responsive to whole mandibular gland extracts compared with QMP. The use of these strains clearly pointed to an extra-mandibular source of retinue pheromones (Pankiw et al. 1995; Slessor et al. 1998; Keeling et al. 1999).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11151667     DOI: 10.1007/s001140050764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  8 in total

1.  New components of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen retinue pheromone.

Authors:  Christopher I Keeling; Keith N Slessor; Heather A Higo; Mark L Winston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pheromone communication in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Keith N Slessor; Mark L Winston; Yves Le Conte
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Peripheral modulation of worker bee responses to queen mandibular pheromone.

Authors:  Vanina Vergoz; H James McQuillan; Lisa H Geddes; Kiri Pullar; Brad J Nicholson; Michael G Paulin; Alison R Mercer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Queen-signal modulation of worker pheromonal composition in honeybees.

Authors:  Tamar Katzav-Gozansky; Raphaël Boulay; Victoria Soroker; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Effect of pheromones, hormones, and handling on sucrose response thresholds of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  T Pankiw; R E Page
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Individual variation in pheromone response correlates with reproductive traits and brain gene expression in worker honey bees.

Authors:  Sarah D Kocher; Julien F Ayroles; Eric A Stone; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Olfactory attraction of the hornet Vespa velutina to honeybee colony odors and pheromones.

Authors:  Antoine Couto; Karine Monceau; Olivier Bonnard; Denis Thiéry; Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of insemination quantity on honey bee queen physiology.

Authors:  Freddie-Jeanne Richard; David R Tarpy; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.