Literature DB >> 11149500

Clinical and finite element analysis of a modular femoral prosthesis consisting of a head and stem component in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures.

H J Andress1, S Kahl, C Kranz, P Gierer, M Schürmann, G Lob.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the biomechanical characteristics and potential clinical efficacy of a cementless modular femoral prosthesis consisting of a variable head (50 to 80 millimeters) and stem (length 120 to 280 millimeters, diameter 10 to 20 millimeters) component in patients with pertrochanteric femoral fracture.
DESIGN: Finite element analysis (FEA) of different lengths and diameters of prosthesis components and first clinical prospective study in pertrochanteric femoral fracture.
METHOD: Using a 3D-CAD program, a model of femoral cortical bone with a pertrochanteric fracture was created and combined with a model of the prosthesis. This model was transferred into an FEA program. After applying a torsion-bending load of 2,000 N (25 degrees, 45 degrees) on the prosthesis, stress distribution in the cortical bone was determined for different lengths (160 to 240 millimeters) and diameters (10 and 12 millimeters) of stem. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients with pertrochanteric fractures (very unstable or osteoarthritis) were treated with a modular hip arthroplasty. Complications, fracture healing, and results at first follow-up (average 13 months) were determined.
RESULTS: FEA analysis indicated that reduction in stress was less when a prosthesis with a short stem was used. Shear stress in the interface bone/prosthesis was not affected by stem length. Prostheses with thin stems produced higher sheer stresses than those with thick stems. Results of FEA were used as the basis for clinical application of the device. None of the patients died, and all patients were able to walk, although some needed a cane or walker after surgery. There was no increase in thigh pain compared with reported pretrauma levels. Radiographs showed subsidence of up to 5 millimeters in 20 percent of patients. However, all but one prosthesis was stable at follow-up. Fracture healing was achieved in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: If proximal fixation of a femoral uncemented stem cannot be achieved, stem diameter should provide maximum cortical contact to reduce sheer stress. Longer stems do not necessarily provide additional stability. By using this prosthesis and selection method, a good outcome at first follow-up was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11149500     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200011000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  9 in total

1.  [Revision hip stems: an analysis of the fixation].

Authors:  M Thomsen; J P Kretzer; C Heisel; C Lee; J Nadorf; E Jakubowitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Marc N Thomsen; Christian Heisel; Alexander Jahnke; Jan P Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Salvage of failed hip osteosynthesis for fractures with modular hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Panagiotis K Karampinas; George Kollias; John Vlamis; Eustratios A Papadelis; Spiros G Pneumaticos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-10

4.  Comparison of effects of different screw materials in the triangle fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Kadir Gok; Sermet Inal; Arif Gok; Eyyup Gulbandilar
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Won Sik Choy; Jae Hoon Ahn; Joon-Hyuk Ko; Byoung Sup Kam; Do-Hyun Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-11-05

6.  Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  M Hoffmann; M Hartel; J M Rueger; W Lehmann
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yusuf Oztürkmen; Mahmut Karamehmetoğlu; Mustafa Caniklioğlu; Yener Ince; Ibrahim Azboy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Calcar Preservation Arthroplasty for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in Elderly.

Authors:  Mustafa Celiktas; Emre Togrul; Ozkan Kose
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-11-13

9.  Femoral Stress Changes after Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Ribbed Prosthesis: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Changqi Luo; Xiang-Dong Wu; Yifei Wan; Junyi Liao; Qiang Cheng; Mian Tian; Zhibiao Bai; Wei Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.