Literature DB >> 11148318

Decision technology.

W Edwards1, B Fasolo.   

Abstract

This review is about decision technology-the rules and tools that help us make wiser decisions. First, we review the three rules that are at the heart of most traditional decision technology-multi-attribute utility, Bayes' theorem, and subjective expected utility maximization. Since the inception of decision research, these rules have prescribed how we should infer values and probabilities and how we should combine them to make better decisions. We suggest how to make best use of all three rules in a comprehensive 19-step model. The remainder of the review explores recently developed tools of decision technology. It examines the characteristics and problems of decision-facilitating sites on the World Wide Web. Such sites now provide anyone who can use a personal computer with access to very sophisticated decision-aiding tools structured mainly to facilitate consumer decision making. It seems likely that the Web will be the mode by means of which decision tools will be distributed to lay users. But methods for doing such apparently simple things as winnowing 3000 options down to a more reasonable number, like 10, contain traps for unwary decision technologists. The review briefly examines Bayes nets and influence diagrams-judgment and decision-making tools that are available as computer programs. It very briefly summarizes the state of the art of eliciting probabilities from experts. It concludes that decision tools will be as important in the 21st century as spreadsheets were in the 20th.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11148318     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  5 in total

1.  Building a model to understand youth service access: the gateway provider model.

Authors:  Arlene Rubin Stiffman; Bernice Pescosolido; Leopoldo J Cabassa
Journal:  Ment Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12

2.  Why values elicitation techniques enable people to make informed decisions about cancer trial participation.

Authors:  Purva Abhyankar; Hilary L Bekker; Barbara A Summers; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The Impact of the Mode of Thought in Complex Decisions: Intuitive Decisions are Better.

Authors:  Marius Usher; Zohar Russo; Mark Weyers; Ran Brauner; Dan Zakay
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-15

4.  [Decision-making process and evaluation of public health interventions].

Authors:  L-R Salmi; L Noël; F Saillour-Glénisson
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 0.686

5.  Does technique matter; a pilot study exploring weighting techniques for a multi-criteria decision support framework.

Authors:  Janine van Til; Catharina Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Marijke Lieferink; James Dolan; Mireille Goetghebeur
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-11-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.