Literature DB >> 11147906

Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma.

H Noguchi1, Y Naomoto, H Kondo, M Haisa, T Yamatsuji, K Shigemitsu, H Aoki, H Isozaki, N Tanaka.   

Abstract

Esophageal superficial carcinoma safely can be resected surgically or endoscopically. We evaluated indications for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and optimal treatment modality for superficial carcinoma of the esophagus based on clinical and pathologic analyses. Between January 1, 1984, and September 30, 1999, 113 patients with superficial cancer of the esophagus underwent surgical or endoscopic resection (n = 33 patients, 36 lesions). The two-channel method, esophageal EMR-tube method or EMR cap-fitted panendoscope was used. Mucosal and submucosal cancers were classified to be epithelial layer (m1), proper mucosal layer (m2), muscularis mucosae (m3), upper third of the submucosal level (sm1), middle third of the submucosal layer (sm2), or the lower third of the submucosal level (sm3) cancers, according to criteria of the Japanese Society for Esophageal Disease. Absolute indication for EMR was restricted to m1 or m2 cancers, and relative indications for EMR included m3 or sm1 lesions. In our department, indications for EMR were not related to size or circumference of lesions. Lymph vessel invasion and lymph node metastasis markedly increased in lesions that infiltrated the lamina muscularis mucosa (m3). All lesions resected with use of EMR were 0-II (flat), and the depth of invasion in 10 0-IIa or 0-IIb lesions was m1 or m2. Twenty-one 0-IIc lesions were distributed widely from m1 to sm1. All 0-IIa+IIc lesions were m3 or sm1. Preoperative diagnosis accurately was established preoperatively in 61% of patients. Complications related to EMR were detected in 21% of patients and included perforation, stenosis, and hemorrhage. Ten patients also received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or esophagectomy with lymph node dissection after use of EMR. No such combination therapy was administered in six patients with m3 lesions, but without lymph vessel invasion. All patients treated with use of EMR, including patients with m3 cancer who did not receive additional treatment, are living without recurrence. Local resection with use of EMR could be regarded to be the preferred treatment of superficial esophageal cancers limited to the lamina propria mucosae. Endoscopic mucosal resection also could be regarded to be the preferred treatment of m3 cancer without lymph vessel invasion. Use of additional therapy, such as radiotherapy, allows the use of EMR for m3 cancer with lymph vessel invasion or sm1 cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11147906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  15 in total

1.  Early Barrett's carcinoma: the depth of infiltration of the tumour correlates with the degree of differentiation, the incidence of lymphatic vessel and venous invasion.

Authors:  Barbara Zemler; Andrea May; Christian Ell; Manfred Stolte
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Current Strategies in the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

Review 3.  Endoscopic therapy for Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  H Barr; N Stone; B Rembacken
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia: report of safety and effectiveness from a large prospective trial.

Authors:  Shun He; Jacques Bergman; Yueming Zhang; Bas Weusten; Liyan Xue; Xiumin Qin; Lizhou Dou; Yong Liu; David Fleischer; Ning Lu; Sanford M Dawsey; Gui-Qi Wang
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas-R Puli; Jyotsna-Bk Reddy; Matthew-L Bechtold; Daphne Antillon; Jamal-A Ibdah; Mainor-R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Identification of the layered morphology of the esophageal wall by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Satoshi Yokosawa; Tomoyuki Koike; Yasushi Kitagawa; Waku Hatta; Kaname Uno; Yasuhiko Abe; Katsunori Iijima; Akira Imatani; Shuichi Ohara; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Clinical impact of predicting CCND1 amplification using plasma DNA in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuhei Komatsu; Daisuke Ichikawa; Shoji Hirajima; Hiroki Takeshita; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Tsutomu Kawaguchi; Mahito Miyamae; Hirotaka Konishi; Takeshi Kubota; Kazuma Okamoto; Nobuaki Yagi; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  The safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for treating early oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Y Wang; X Zeng; S Y Bai; K Pu; Y Zheng; R Ji; Q H Guo; Q L Guan; Y P Wang; Y N Zhou
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Hauke Lang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Surgical treatments for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus reaching to the muscularis mucosa or the upper third of the submucosal layer.

Authors:  Junya Oguma; Soji Ozawa; Yoshiro Saikawa; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.