AIM: To assess each layer of the optical coherence tomography (OCT) image of the esophageal wall with reference to the histological structure. METHODS: Resected specimens of fresh pig esophagus was used as a model for the esophageal wall. We injected cyanoacrylate adhesive into the specimens to create a marker, and scanned them using a miniature OCT probe. The localization of these markers was assessed in the OCT images. Then we compared the OCT-imaged morphology with the corresponding histological section, guided by the cyanoacrylate adhesive markers. We prepared a second set of experiments using nylon sutures as markers. RESULTS: The OCT image of the esophageal specimen has a clear five-layered morphology. First, it consisted of a relatively less reflective layer; second, a more reflective layer; third, a less reflective layer; fourth, a more reflective layer; and fifth, a less reflective layer. Comparing the OCT images with marked histological sections showed that the first layer corresponded to stratified squamous epithelium; the second to lamina propria; the third to muscularis mucosa; fourth, submucosa; and fifth, muscularis propria with deeper structures of the esophageal wall. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the OCT image of the normal esophageal wall showed a five-layered morphology, which corresponds to histological esophageal wall components.
AIM: To assess each layer of the optical coherence tomography (OCT) image of the esophageal wall with reference to the histological structure. METHODS: Resected specimens of fresh pig esophagus was used as a model for the esophageal wall. We injected cyanoacrylate adhesive into the specimens to create a marker, and scanned them using a miniature OCT probe. The localization of these markers was assessed in the OCT images. Then we compared the OCT-imaged morphology with the corresponding histological section, guided by the cyanoacrylate adhesive markers. We prepared a second set of experiments using nylon sutures as markers. RESULTS: The OCT image of the esophageal specimen has a clear five-layered morphology. First, it consisted of a relatively less reflective layer; second, a more reflective layer; third, a less reflective layer; fourth, a more reflective layer; and fifth, a less reflective layer. Comparing the OCT images with marked histological sections showed that the first layer corresponded to stratified squamous epithelium; the second to lamina propria; the third to muscularis mucosa; fourth, submucosa; and fifth, muscularis propria with deeper structures of the esophageal wall. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the OCT image of the normal esophageal wall showed a five-layered morphology, which corresponds to histological esophageal wall components.
Authors: G Zuccaro; N Gladkova; J Vargo; F Feldchtein; E Zagaynova; D Conwell; G Falk; J Goldblum; J Dumot; J Ponsky; G Gelikonov; B Davros; E Donchenko; J Richter Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: John A Evans; Brett E Bouma; Jason Bressner; Milen Shishkov; Gregory Y Lauwers; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Norman S Nishioka; Guillermo J Tearney Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito Journal: Science Date: 1991-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: M V Sivak; K Kobayashi; J A Izatt; A M Rollins; R Ung-Runyawee; A Chak; R C Wong; G A Isenberg; J Willis Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: S Jäckle; N Gladkova; F Feldchtein; A Terentieva; B Brand; G Gelikonov; V Gelikonov; A Sergeev; A Fritscher-Ravens; J Freund; U Seitz; S Schröder; N Soehendra Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Johnathon M Aho; Ivan Z Nenadic; Sara Aristizabal; Dennis A Wigle; Daniel J Tschumperlin; Matthew W Urban Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Date: 2016-11-23