Literature DB >> 11146819

Field of view affects reaching, not grasping.

S J Watt1, M F Bradshaw, S K Rushton.   

Abstract

It has been observed that wearing goggles that restrict the field of view (FOV) causes familiar objects to appear both smaller and nearer. To investigate this further, we examined the effect of a range of field sizes (4 degrees, 8 degrees, 16 degrees, 32 degrees and 64 degrees) on estimates of object distance and object size used to control reaching and grasping movements of binocular observers. No visual or haptic feedback was available during the experiment. It was found that, as the FOV was decreased, the distance reached by subjects also decreased, whereas the size of their grasp was unaffected. In a second experiment, we compared reaching and grasping responses under binocular and monocular conditions for 8 degrees and 64 degrees field sizes and show that the effects of FOV do not result from the progressive loss of binocular information. We conclude that reducing the FOV produces substantial and dissociable effects on reaching and grasping behaviour and that field size must be taken into account in any context where visuo-motor performance is important.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11146819     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  9 in total

1.  Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Susannah Murphy; Isla McKenna; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual uncertainty unveils the distinct role of haptic cues in multisensory grasping.

Authors:  Ivan Camponogara; Robert Volcic
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments.

Authors:  Sandeep K Subramanian; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Involvement of the Extrageniculate System in the Perception of Optical Illusions: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Tabei; Masayuki Satoh; Hirotaka Kida; Moeni Kizaki; Haruno Sakuma; Hajime Sakuma; Hidekazu Tomimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Dennis M Levi; Daphné Bavelier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  How vision affects kinematic properties of pantomimed prehension movements.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-07

9.  The Argus II prosthesis facilitates reaching and grasping tasks: a case series.

Authors:  Aachal Kotecha; Joe Zhong; David Stewart; Lyndon da Cruz
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.209

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.