Literature DB >> 11145388

The reliability of the American Knee Society Score.

R Y Liow1, K Walker, M A Wajid, G Bedi, C M Lennox.   

Abstract

We have investigated the reliability of the American Knee Society Score (AKS), a widely used functional outcome score for knee arthroplasty. 29 subjects were assessed in random order by 6 observers, each patient seen twice by each observer. The interobserver reference intervals were 16 points for the Knee Score (0-100 points) and 21 points for the Function Score (0-100 points). The intraobserver reference intervals were smaller, 11 points and 13 points for the Knee Score and the Function Score, respectively. The presence of arthritis in other joints and general debility did not affect the reliability of the scores. The more experienced observers had greater intraobserver reproducibility. Notably, we found moderate agreement between observers in the subjective variables, while the objective variables produced lower levels of agreement. The high inter- and intraobserver variations of the AKS makes estimation of score change questionable. Reliable use of the AKS would necessitate repeated evaluation by an experienced observer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11145388     DOI: 10.1080/000164700317362244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  29 in total

1.  The potential utility of patient-reported range of motion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jack Weick; Harpreet S Bawa
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

2.  Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses.

Authors:  D Biau; M M Mullins; T Judet; P Piriou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Clinical usefulness of hindfoot assessment for total knee arthroplasty: persistent post-operative hindfoot pain and alignment in pre-existing severe knee deformity.

Authors:  Yoshinori Okamoto; Shuhei Otsuki; Tsuyoshi Jotoku; Mikio Nakajima; Masashi Neo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [The modular MML revision system in knee revision and tumor arthroplasty].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; A Töpfer; J Kircher; H Grundei; P Diehl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  No correlation between coronal alignment of total knee arthroplasty and clinical outcomes: a prospective clinical study using 3D-CT.

Authors:  Omer Slevin; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  How does TKA kinematics vary with transverse plane alignment changes in a contemporary implant?

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Devin J Conner; Rodney Benner; John L Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Development and validation of a new evaluation system for patients with a floor-based lifestyle: the Korean knee score.

Authors:  Jin Goo Kim; Jeong Ku Ha; Seung Beom Han; Tae Kyun Kim; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Shinya Kawahara; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Relationship between patient-reported disease severity in osteoarthritis and self-reported pain, function and work productivity.

Authors:  Alesia B Sadosky; Andrew G Bushmakin; Joseph C Cappelleri; David R Lionberger
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Men versus women: does size matter in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Roger H Emerson; Jessica Martinez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.