Literature DB >> 11142865

When does duration matter in judgment and decision making?

D Ariely1, G Loewenstein.   

Abstract

Research on sequences of outcomes shows that people care about features of an experience, such as improvement or deterioration over time, and peak and end levels, which the discounted utility model (DU) assumes they do not care about. In contrast to the finding that some attributes are weighted more than DU predicts, Kahneman and coauthors have proposed that there is one feature of sequences that DU predicts people should care about but that people in fact ignore or underweight: duration. In this article, the authors extend this line of research by investigating the role of conversational norms (H. P. Grice, 1975), and scale-norming (D. Kahneman & T. D. Miller, 1986). The impact of these 2 factors are examined in 4 parallel studies that manipulate these factors orthogonally. The major finding is that response modes that reduce reliance on conversational norms or standard of comparison also increase the attention that participants pay to duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11142865     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.4.508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  12 in total

Review 1.  The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice.

Authors:  Karolina M Lempert; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Valuing prevention through economic evaluation: some considerations regarding the choice of discount model for health effects with focus on infectious diseases.

Authors:  Jasper M Bos; Philippe Beutels; Lieven Annemans; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Discounting health effects in pharmacoeconomic evaluations: current controversies.

Authors:  J M Bos; Maarten J Postma; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A test of the peak-end rule with extended autobiographical events.

Authors:  Simon Kemp; Christopher D B Burt; Laura Furneaux
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

Review 5.  Cellular and molecular basis of decision-making.

Authors:  Nilay Yapici; Manuel Zimmer; Ana I Domingos
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.

Authors:  Edward A Vessel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Time and decision making in humans.

Authors:  Florian Klapproth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Saving the best for last? A cross-species analysis of choices between reinforcer sequences.

Authors:  Leonardo F Andrade; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice mechanisms for past, temporally extended outcomes.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  An Empirical Investigation of Factors Affecting Perceived Quality and Well-Being of Children Using an Online Child Helpline.

Authors:  Willemijn van Dolen; Charles B Weinberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.