Literature DB >> 11139630

Assessment of clone identity and sequence fidelity for 1189 IMAGE cDNA clones.

R G Halgren1, M R Fielden, C J Fong, T R Zacharewski.   

Abstract

This report documents the error rate in a commercially distributed subset of the IMAGE Consortium mouse cDNA clone collection. After isolation of plasmid DNA from 1189 bacterial stock cultures, only 62. 2% were uncontaminated and contained cDNA inserts that had significant sequence identity to published data for the ordered clones. An agarose gel electrophoresis pre-screening strategy identified 361 stock cultures that appeared to contain two or more plasmid species. Isolation of individual colonies from these stocks demonstrated that 7.1% of the original 1189 stocks contained both a correct and an incorrect plasmid. 5.9% of the original 1189 stocks contained multiple, distinct, incorrect plasmids, indicating the likelihood of multiple contaminating events. While only 739 of the stocks purchased contained the desired cDNA clone, agarose gel pre-screening, colony isolation and similarity searching of dbEST allowed for the identification of an additional 420 clones that would have otherwise been discarded. Considering the high error rate in this subset of the IMAGE cDNA clone set, the use of sequence verified clones for cDNA microarray construction is warranted. When this is not possible, pre-screening non-sequence verified clones with agarose gel electrophoresis provides an inexpensive and efficient method to eliminate contaminated clones from the probe set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139630      PMCID: PMC29671          DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.2.582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  6 in total

1.  BLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  T A Tatusova; T L Madden
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Basic local alignment search tool.

Authors:  S F Altschul; W Gish; W Miller; E W Myers; D J Lipman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Authors:  D L Wheeler; C Chappey; A E Lash; D D Leipe; T L Madden; G D Schuler; T A Tatusova; B A Rapp
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.

Authors:  S F Altschul; T L Madden; A A Schäffer; J Zhang; Z Zhang; W Miller; D J Lipman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  dbEST--database for "expressed sequence tags".

Authors:  M S Boguski; T M Lowe; C M Tolstoshev
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  The I.M.A.G.E. Consortium: an integrated molecular analysis of genomes and their expression.

Authors:  G Lennon; C Auffray; M Polymeropoulos; M B Soares
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 5.736

  6 in total
  27 in total

Review 1.  Reliability and reproducibility issues in DNA microarray measurements.

Authors:  Sorin Draghici; Purvesh Khatri; Aron C Eklund; Zoltan Szallasi
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Analysis of microarray experiments of gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Roberto Romero; Sorin Draghici
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Microarray analysis reveals differential gene expression in hybrid sunflower species.

Authors:  Zhao Lai; Briana L Gross; Yi Zou; Justen Andrews; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Two thyroid hormone-mediated gene expression patterns in vivo identified by cDNA expression arrays in rat.

Authors:  J M Weitzel; C Radtke; H J Seitz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Methods in molecular cardiology: microarray technology.

Authors:  B van den Bosch; P A Doevendans; D Lips; H J M Smeets
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  A comparison of cDNA, oligonucleotide, and Affymetrix GeneChip gene expression microarray platforms.

Authors:  Yong Woo; Jason Affourtit; Sandra Daigle; Agnes Viale; Kevin Johnson; Jurgen Naggert; Gary Churchill
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2004-12

Review 7.  Review of the literature examining the correlation among DNA microarray technologies.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; M Lynn Berndt
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Development and validation of a Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri DNA microarray platform (XACarray) generated from the shotgun libraries previously used in the sequencing of this bacterial genome.

Authors:  Leandro M Moreira; Marcelo L de Laia; Robson F de Souza; Paulo A Zaini; Ana Cr da Silva; Aline M da Silva; Jesus A Ferro
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-05-27

Review 9.  A molecular description of brain trauma pathophysiology using microarray technology: an overview.

Authors:  Pramod K Dash; Nobuhide Kobori; Anthony N Moore
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 10.  Gene expression arrays as a tool to unravel mechanisms of normal tissue radiation injury and prediction of response.

Authors:  Jacqueline J C M Kruse; Fiona A Stewart
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.