Literature DB >> 11139510

Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: implications for translational selection.

K A Dunn1, J P Bielawski, Z Yang.   

Abstract

The relationships between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates and between synonymous rate and codon usage bias are important to our understanding of the roles of mutation and selection in the evolution of Drosophila genes. Previous studies used approximate estimation methods that ignore codon bias. In this study we reexamine those relationships using maximum-likelihood methods to estimate substitution rates, which accommodate the transition/transversion rate bias and codon usage bias. We compiled a sample of homologous DNA sequences at 83 nuclear loci from Drosophila melanogaster and at least one other species of Drosophila. Our analysis was consistent with previous studies in finding that synonymous rates were positively correlated with nonsynonymous rates. Our analysis differed from previous studies, however, in that synonymous rates were unrelated to codon bias. We therefore conducted a simulation study to investigate the differences between approaches. The results suggested that failure to properly account for multiple substitutions at the same site and for biased codon usage by approximate methods can lead to an artifactual correlation between synonymous rate and codon bias. Implications of the results for translational selection are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139510      PMCID: PMC1461466     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

1.  Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models.

Authors:  Z Yang; R Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Rates of nucleotide substitution and mammalian nuclear gene evolution. Approximate and maximum-likelihood methods lead to different conclusions.

Authors:  J P Bielawski; K A Dunn; Z Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Synonymous nucleotide substitution rates in mammalian genes: implications for the molecular clock and the relationship of mammalian orders.

Authors:  M Bulmer; K H Wolfe; P M Sharp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  New methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions.

Authors:  Y Ina
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  E N Moriyama; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.

Authors:  N Goldman; Z Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Switch in codon bias and increased rates of amino acid substitution in the Drosophila saltans species group.

Authors:  F Rodríguez-Trelles; R Tarrío; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Compositional heterogeneity and patterns of molecular evolution in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  J P Carulli; D E Krane; D L Hartl; H Ochman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The effects of mutation and natural selection on codon bias in the genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  R M Kliman; J Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  31 in total

1.  The problem of counting sites in the estimation of the synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates: implications for the correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias.

Authors:  Nicolas Bierne; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Fyodor A Kondrashov; Daniel L Hartl; Rob J Kulathinal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  cis-Regulatory and protein evolution in orthologous and duplicate genes.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Daniel L Hartl; Guillaume Achaz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Hypervariable noncoding sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Joseph A Benavides
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolutionary rates and expression level in Chlamydomonas.

Authors:  Cristina E Popescu; Tudor Borza; Joseph P Bielawski; Robert W Lee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Correlated evolution of synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais; Tomislav Domazet-Loso; Diethard Tautz; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Weak selection and protein evolution.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akashi; Naoki Osada; Tomoko Ohta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The evolutionary analysis of "orphans" from the Drosophila genome identifies rapidly diverging and incorrectly annotated genes.

Authors:  K J Schmid; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  David J Begun; Alisha K Holloway; Kristian Stevens; Ladeana W Hillier; Yu-Ping Poh; Matthew W Hahn; Phillip M Nista; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Lior Pachter; Eugene Myers; Charles H Langley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Analysis of a shift in codon usage in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Powell; Erminia Sezzi; Etsuko N Moriyama; Jennifer M Gleason; Adalgisa Caccone
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.