Literature DB >> 11138685

Phase I therapy study of 186Re-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody U36 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

D R Colnot1, J J Quak, J C Roos, A van Lingen, A J Wilhelm, G J van Kamp, P C Huijgens, G B Snow, G A van Dongen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A phase I therapy study was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, immunogenicity, and therapeutic potential of 186Re-labeled anti-CD44v6 chimeric monoclonal antibody (cMAb) U36 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). The potential of a diagnostic study with 99mTc-cMAb U36 to predict the biodistribution of 186Re-cMAb U36 was evaluated.
METHODS: Thirteen patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC were given 750 MBq 99mTc-cMAb U36 (2 mg) followed 1 wk later by a single dose of 186Re-cMAb U36 (12 or 52 mg) in radiation dose-escalating steps of 0.4, 1.0, and 1.5 GBq/m2. After each administration, planar and SPECT images were obtained, and the pharmacokinetics and development of human antimurine as well as anti-cMAb responses were determined. Radiation absorbed doses to tumor, red marrow, and organs were calculated.
RESULTS: Administration was well tolerated, and excellent targeting of tumor lesions was seen in all patients. Dose-limiting myelotoxicity (thrombocytopenia being most prominent) was the only toxicity observed, resulting in grade 4 myelotoxicity in 2 patients treated with 1.5 GBq/m2. The MTD was established at 1.0 GBq/m2, at which a transient grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in 1 patient. One patient showed stable disease for 6 mo after treatment at the MTD. The 2 patients with dose-limiting myelotoxicity showed a marked reduction in tumor size. The reduction was of short duration and, therefore, not considered an objective response. Tumor absorbed doses at MTD ranged from 3.0 to 18.1 Gy. Red marrow doses ranged from 20 to 112 cGy (mean, 51 +/- 16 cGy/GBq) and correlated with platelet nadir (r = 0.8; P < 0.01). Pharmacokinetics varied between patients treated at the same dose level and were accurately predicted by the diagnostic procedure. Five patients experienced a human anti-cMAb response, 1 of which was a human antimouse antibody response.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that 186Re-cMAb U36 can be safely administered, with dose-limiting myelotoxicity at 41 mCi/m2. The use of cMAb U36 instead of its murine counterpart did not decrease the induction of human antibody responses. The availability of a 99mTc-labeled diagnostic study that can predict the pharmacokinetics of 186Re-cMAb U36 offers the possibility of using such a study for selection of a safe radioimmunotherapy dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  23 in total

Review 1.  PET tracers based on Zirconium-89.

Authors:  Yin Zhang; Hao Hong; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Curr Radiopharm       Date:  2011-04

Review 2.  Protein-based tumor molecular imaging probes.

Authors:  Xin Lin; Jin Xie; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.520

3.  Chemoradionuclide therapy with 186re-labeled liposomal doxorubicin: toxicity, dosimetry, and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Anuradha Soundararajan; Ande Bao; William T Phillips; Linda M McManus; Beth A Goins
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.099

Review 4.  Labeling biomolecules with radiorhenium: a review of the bifunctional chelators.

Authors:  Guozheng Liu; Donald J Hnatowich
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 5.  Targeted therapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  S K Kundu; M Nestor
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-02-29

6.  Phase I Study of Yttrium-90 Radiolabeled M5A Anti-Carcinoembryonic Antigen Humanized Antibody in Patients with Advanced Carcinoembryonic Antigen Producing Malignancies.

Authors:  David Akhavan; Paul Yazaki; Dave Yamauchi; Jennifer Simpson; Paul H Frankel; James Bading; David Colcher; Kofi Poku; Yi-Jen Chen; Dean Lim; Mihaela Cristea; Anna Wu; John Shively; Jeffrey Y C Wong
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  In vitro evaluation of the astatinated chimeric monoclonal antibody U36, a potential candidate for treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Nestor; M Persson; G A M S van Dongen; H J Jensen; H Lundqvist; M Anniko; V Tolmachev
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Pharmacokinetics of radioimmunotherapeutic agent of direct labeling mAb 188Re-HAb18.

Authors:  Chao Lou; Zhi-Nan Chen; Hui-Jie Bian; Jie Li; Shou-Bo Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Antidrug Antibody Formation in Oncology: Clinical Relevance and Challenges.

Authors:  Emilie M J van Brummelen; Willeke Ros; Gertjan Wolbink; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 10.  Targeting head and neck tumoral stem cells: From biological aspects to therapeutic perspectives.

Authors:  Benoîte Méry; Jean-Baptiste Guy; Sophie Espenel; Anne-Sophie Wozny; Stéphanie Simonet; Alexis Vallard; Gersende Alphonse; Dominique Ardail; Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse; Nicolas Magné
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.