Literature DB >> 11137688

Advances in minimally invasive surgery in children.

K E Georgeson1, E Owings.   

Abstract

Minimal access pediatric surgery has developed more slowly than its adult counterpart for several reasons. Surgical pain and perioperative stress associated with open procedures have been underappreciated in children. Appropriately sized instrumentation was slow to develop because the focus of the marketplace was the adult. The advanced techniques required for pediatric laparoscopic procedures are associated with a relatively long learning curve. Reports documenting the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of pediatric endosurgery are fueling a rapid evolution in instrumentation and minimal access procedures for children. This evolution will eventually influence most pediatric surgical procedures, changing the paradigm of the practice of pediatric surgery. It is the pediatric patient who has the most to gain from these alterations in their surgical care with less pain, decreased hospital days, and earlier return to regular activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11137688     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00554-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  11 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgical techniques are safe in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric malignancies.

Authors:  Shannon N Acker; Jennifer L Bruny; Timothy P Garrington; David A Partrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children.

Authors:  Elvira C van Dalen; Manou S de Lijster; Lieve Gj Leijssen; Erna Mc Michiels; Leontien Cm Kremer; Huib N Caron; Daniel C Aronson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-05

Review 3.  Robotic surgery in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Jason P Van Batavia; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.

Authors:  Rohit Tejwani; Brian J Young; Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; Steven Wolf; J Todd Purves; John S Wiener; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  The rabbit model serves as a valuable operative experience and helps to establish new techniques for abdominal and thoracic endosurgery.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Kirlum; Martina Heinrich; Holger Till
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Transumbilical approach for shunt insertion in the pediatric population: an improvement in cosmetic results.

Authors:  Didier Scavarda; J Breaud; M Khalil; A Paz Paredes; M Takahashi; V Fouquet; C Louis-Borrione; G Lena
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Versatility of the circumumbilical incision in neonatal surgery.

Authors:  Fiona J Murphy; A Mohee; Basem Khalil; Anupam Lall; Antonino Morabito; Adrian Bianchi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Early experience with laparoscopic surgery in children in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Authors:  Ademola Olusegun Talabi; Adewale Oluseye Adisa; Olufemi Adefehinti; Oludayo Adedapo Sowande; Amarachukwu Chiduziem Etonyeaku; Olusanya Adejuyigbe
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

9.  Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery.

Authors:  Chaeyoun Oh; Joong Kee Youn; Ji-Won Han; Hyun-Young Kim; Sung-Eun Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  The Use of Massage Therapy as a Nonpharmacological Approach to Relieve Postlaparoscopic Shoulder Pain: a Pediatric Case Report.

Authors:  Deborah Zerkle; Erin Gates
Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork       Date:  2020-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.