Literature DB >> 11136917

Effects of task goal and personal preference on seated reaching kinematics after stroke.

C Y Wu1, M K Wong, K C Lin, H C Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Current theories of motor control in rehabilitation focus on how the nervous system responds to many types of external and internal constraints to execute motor behavior to accomplish a task. However, the dynamic interplay between these 2 constraints remains unclear. This study examined the impact of some aspects of internal and external constraints on motor performance in persons with stroke.
METHODS: Twenty-seven persons with stroke used the uninvolved arms to perform an upper-extremity reaching task under 4 experimental conditions, formed by the crossing of functional goals and personal preferences. For the higher level of a functional goal, subjects took a drink from a can of beverage. For the lower level of a functional goal, subjects brought the can to the mouth without drinking. The level of personal preferences was determined, by interview, by the degree of predilection for particular beverages.
RESULTS: Significant and large effects of functional goals and personal preference were found in the variables of movement time and reaction time. However, the data trend of the 4 testing conditions varied according to presence of visuospatial neglect and side of lesion.
CONCLUSIONS: Offering choices for the treatment activities and incorporating functional goals to therapeutic tasks might enhance response rate or movement efficiency, depending on the side of the lesion and presence of visuospatial neglect. The findings suggest that the consideration of the neglect phenomenon is a necessity when rehabilitative treatment planning incorporates constraint factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11136917     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.32.1.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury.

Authors:  P H McCrea; J J Eng; A J Hodgson
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-07-10       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.

Authors:  Antonin Viau; Anatol G Feldman; Bradford J McFadyen; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Recovery of kinematic arm function in well-performing people with subacute stroke: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Gyrd Thrane; Margit Alt Murphy; Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  A pilot study evaluating use of a computer-assisted neurorehabilitation platform for upper-extremity stroke assessment.

Authors:  Xin Feng; Jack M Winters
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Harnessing motivation to alleviate neglect.

Authors:  Charlotte Russell; Korina Li; Paresh A Malhotra
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Effects of object size and distance on reaching kinematics in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Shu-Mei Wang; Li-Chieh Kuo; Wen-Chen Ouyang; Hsiao-Man Hsu; Hui-Ing Ma
Journal:  Hong Kong J Occup Ther       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 0.917

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.