Literature DB >> 11136488

Recent magnitude of and temporal trends (1994-1997) in the incidence and hospital death rates of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the second national registry of myocardial infarction.

R J Goldberg1, J M Gore, C A Thompson, J H Gurwitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited recent data are available to describe the magnitude of, and temporal trends in, the incidence and case-fatality rates associated with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to examine recent (1994-1997) trends in the incidence of, and hospital death rates from, cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction from a large, multihospital national perspective.
METHODS: An observational study was performed of 426,253 patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction in 1662 hospitals throughout the United States between 1994 and 1997.
RESULTS: The incidence rates of cardiogenic shock averaged 6.2%. There was evidence for a slight decline in these rates between 1994 (6.6%) and 1997 (6.0%). Results of a multivariable regression analysis controlling for factors that might affect the risk of development of cardiogenic shock indicated that patients hospitalized in more recent years were at significantly lower risk for shock. Patients with shock had a markedly increased risk for dying during hospitalization compared with patients not having shock (74% vs 10%). Significant, albeit small, absolute differences were observed in the risk of dying after cardiogenic shock over time (76% dying in 1997, 72% dying in 1994). These improving trends were magnified, however, after potentially confounding prognostic factors were controlled: patients having shock in 1997 were at approximately one fifth lower risk of dying (odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.87) than those hospitalized in 1994.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a slight decline in the incidence rates of cardiogenic shock and improving trends in the hospital survival of patients with shock. Despite these trends, it remains of considerable importance to prevent this clinical syndrome, given its high lethality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11136488     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2001.111405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  18 in total

Review 1.  Heart failure and shock complicating acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Frederick A Spencer; Theo Meyer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Unequal access to interventional cardiac care in Nova Scotia in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  J Mayich; Jafna L Cox; Karen J Buth; Jean-Francois Légaré
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation: are we optimizing the management of cardiogenic shock?

Authors:  F Shahid; M Akhtar; F Khan; C A A Chahal
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry.

Authors:  Tina Backhaus; Andreas Fach; Johannes Schmucker; Eduard Fiehn; Daniela Garstka; Janina Stehmeier; Rainer Hambrecht; Harm Wienbergen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Long-term predictive factors of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Eun Hui Bae; Sang Yup Lim; Myung Ho Jeong; Hyung Wook Park; Ji Hyun Lim; Young Joon Hong; Weon Kim; Ju Han Kim; Jeong Gwan Cho; Young Keun Ahn; Jong Chun Park; Soon Pal Suh; Byoung Hee Ahn; Sang Hyung Kim; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 6.  [Infarct-related cardiogenic shock : Prognosis and treatment].

Authors:  R Prondzinsky; H Lemm; A Geppert; M Buerke; M Russ; K Werdan
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Mitchell Levy; Peter J D Andrews; Jean Chastre; Leonard D Hudson; Constantine Manthous; G Umberto Meduri; Rui P Moreno; Christian Putensen; Thomas Stewart; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Montalescot; H R Andersen; D Antoniucci; A Betriu; M J de Boer; L Grip; F J Neumann; M T Rothman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  [Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction].

Authors:  U Janssens
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  Decade-Long Trends (2001-2011) in the Incidence and Hospital Death Rates Associated with the In-Hospital Development of Cardiogenic Shock after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Raghavendra Charan P Makam; Jorge Yarzebski; David D McManus; Darleen Lessard; Joel M Gore
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.