Literature DB >> 11134232

Electrostatics and the gating pore of Shaker potassium channels.

L D Islas1, F J Sigworth.   

Abstract

Various experiments have suggested that the S4 segment in voltage-dependent Na(+) and K(+) channels is in contact with a solvent-accessible cavity. We explore the consequences of the existence of such a cavity through the electrostatic effects on the gating currents of Shaker K(+) channels under conditions of reduced ionic strength S. We observe that approximately 10-fold reductions of intracellular S produce reductions of the measured gating charge of approximately 10%. These effects continue at even lower values of S. The reduction of gating charge when S is reduced by 10-fold at the extracellular surface is much smaller (approximately 2%). Shifts of the Q(V) curve because of a reduced S are small (<10 mV in size), which is consistent with very little fixed surface charge. Continuum electrostatic calculations show that the S effects on gating charge can be explained by the alteration of the local potential in an intracellular conical cavity of 20-24-A depth and 12-A aperture, and a smaller extracellular cavity of 3-A depth and the same aperture. In this case, the attenuation of the membrane potential at low S leads to reduction of the apparent gating charge. We suggest that this cavity is made by a bundle of transmembrane helices, and that the gating charge movement occurs by translocation of charged residues across a thin septum of approximately 3-7 A thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11134232      PMCID: PMC2232467          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.117.1.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  58 in total

1.  Simulation of the packing of idealized transmembrane alpha-helix bundles.

Authors:  H S Son; M S Sansom
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Tanford-Kirkwood electrostatics for protein modeling.

Authors:  J J Havranek; P B Harbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Substituted-cysteine accessibility method.

Authors:  A Karlin; M H Akabas
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Divalent cation effects on the Shaker K channel suggest a pentapeptide sequence as determinant of functional surface charge density.

Authors:  F Elinder; Y Liu; P Arhem
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Internal cavities and buried waters in globular proteins.

Authors:  A A Rashin; M Iofin; B Honig
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-06-17       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Distinguishing surface effects of calcium ion from pore-occupancy effects in Na+ channels.

Authors:  C M Armstrong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Fluctuations in ion channel gating currents. Analysis of nonstationary shot noise.

Authors:  S C Crouzy; F J Sigworth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Direct physical measure of conformational rearrangement underlying potassium channel gating.

Authors:  L M Mannuzzu; M M Moronne; E Y Isacoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-01-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  High apparent dielectric constants in the interior of a protein reflect water penetration.

Authors:  J J Dwyer; A G Gittis; D A Karp; E E Lattman; D S Spencer; W E Stites; B García-Moreno E
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Transfer of twelve charges is needed to open skeletal muscle Na+ channels.

Authors:  B Hirschberg; A Rovner; M Lieberman; J Patlak
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  61 in total

1.  A physical model of potassium channel activation: from energy landscape to gating kinetics.

Authors:  Daniel Sigg; Francisco Bezanilla
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Electrostatic model of S4 motion in voltage-gated ion channels.

Authors:  Harold Lecar; H Peter Larsson; Michael Grabe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Coupled motions between pore and voltage-sensor domains: a model for Shaker B, a voltage-gated potassium channel.

Authors:  Werner Treptow; Bernard Maigret; Christophe Chipot; Mounir Tarek
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Relating microscopic charge movement to macroscopic currents: the Ramo-Shockley theorem applied to ion channels.

Authors:  Wolfgang Nonner; Alexander Peyser; Dirk Gillespie; Bob Eisenberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Structural basis for gating charge movement in the voltage sensor of a sodium channel.

Authors:  Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Paul G DeCaen; Ruth E Westenbroek; Chien-Yuan Pan; Todd Scheuer; David Baker; William A Catterall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A theoretical model for calculating voltage sensitivity of ion channels and the application on Kv1.2 potassium channel.

Authors:  Huaiyu Yang; Zhaobing Gao; Ping Li; Kunqian Yu; Ye Yu; Tian-Le Xu; Min Li; Hualiang Jiang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Coupling between residues on S4 and S1 defines the voltage-sensor resting conformation in NaChBac.

Authors:  Tzur Paldi; Michael Gurevitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Functional diversity of potassium channel voltage-sensing domains.

Authors:  León D Islas
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Initial response of the potassium channel voltage sensor to a transmembrane potential.

Authors:  Werner Treptow; Mounir Tarek; Michael L Klein
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  The electrostatics of VDAC: implications for selectivity and gating.

Authors:  Om P Choudhary; Rachna Ujwal; William Kowallis; Rob Coalson; Jeff Abramson; Michael Grabe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.