Literature DB >> 11133881

Electrical stimulation of anterior visual pathways in retinitis pigmentosa.

J Delbeke1, D Pins, G Michaux, M C Wanet-Defalque, S Parrini, C Veraart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore electrically induced phosphenes in blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in comparison with healthy subjects and to develop a screening test for candidates for an optic nerve visual prosthesis implantation.
METHODS: Phosphenes are obtained by charge balanced biphasic pulse stimulations through a surface cathode over the closed eyelids and an anode near the opposite ear. The resulting strength-duration relationship for somatosensory, phosphene, and pain threshold has been recorded in five RP patients as well as in 10 healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: In sighted subjects, the average rheobase and chronaxy for phosphene perception are 0.28 mA and 3.07 msec, respectively. For pulse durations longer than 2 msec, phosphenes are usually obtained at current strengths below the level giving rise to any other electrically generated sensation. In RP patients, however, phosphenes are not so easily obtained. One in five had no visual response at all. Another patient reported a flash perception for the longest pulse durations only. Spontaneous phosphenes interfered heavily with the stimulation in a third person. Finally, despite the higher threshold, two patients displayed normally shaped strength-duration curves.
CONCLUSIONS: The surface stimulation has proven harmless, adequate, and very helpful to ascertain that the optic nerve can be electrically activated in completely blind individuals. Long-duration stimulation pulses yield very low phosphene thresholds in healthy subjects. Anterior visual pathways activation requires higher currents in RP patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11133881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  16 in total

1.  Ethical considerations for volunteer recruitment of visual prosthesis trials.

Authors:  Yu Xia; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Neural reprogramming in retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Robert E Marc; Bryan W Jones; James R Anderson; Krista Kinard; David W Marshak; John H Wilson; Theodore Wensel; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Getting signals into the brain: visual prosthetics through thalamic microstimulation.

Authors:  John S Pezaris; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Optic nerve potentials and cortical potentials after stimulation of the anterior visual pathway during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Changes in physiological properties of rat ganglion cells during retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; A M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Comparing retinal reflectance changes elicited by transcorneal electrical retinal stimulation with those of optic chiasma stimulation in cats.

Authors:  Toshifumi Mihashi; Yoshitaka Okawa; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi; Yoko Hirohara; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Chronically implanted epidural electrodes in Göttinger minipigs allow function tests of epiretinal implants.

Authors:  Thomas Laube; Thomas Schanze; Claudia Brockmann; Ines Bolle; Thomas Stieglitz; Norbert Bornfeld
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Evaluation of residual retinal function by pupillary constrictions and phosphenes using transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Takeshi Morimoto; Takehiro Fukui; Kenji Matsushita; Yoshitaka Okawa; Hiroshi Shimojyo; Shunji Kusaka; Yasuo Tano; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Retinoic Acid Induces Hyperactivity, and Blocking Its Receptor Unmasks Light Responses and Augments Vision in Retinal Degeneration.

Authors:  Michael Telias; Bristol Denlinger; Zachary Helft; Casey Thornton; Billie Beckwith-Cohen; Richard H Kramer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 18.688

10.  Characteristics of retinal reflectance changes induced by transcorneal electrical stimulation in cat eyes.

Authors:  Takeshi Morimoto; Hiroyuki Kanda; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi; Kohji Nishida; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.