Literature DB >> 11133849

The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project.

G S Rubin1, K Bandeen-Roche, G H Huang, B Muñoz, O D Schein, L P Fried, S K West.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This report examines the relationship between psychophysical measures of visual impairment and self-reported difficulty with everyday visual tasks in a population-based sample of individuals 65 years of age and older.
METHODS: Community-dwelling residents (n = 2520) of Salisbury, MD, between the ages of 65 and 84 were recruited for the study. Visual acuity under normal and low luminance, contrast and glare sensitivity, stereoacuity, and visual fields were measured. Subjective physical disability was assessed with the Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS).
RESULTS: In multiple regression analyses adjusted for demographic factors, cognitive status, depression, and number of comorbid medical conditions, each of the vision tests except low luminance acuity was independently associated with lower ADVS scores. The analyses indicate that a factor of 2 reduction in visual acuity or contrast sensitivity, comparable with that observed in mild to moderate lens opacity, was associated with a three- to fivefold odds of reporting difficulty with daily tasks. Although age alone was a significant risk factor for disability, it was not associated with overall ADVS score, once visual impairment and other chronic medical conditions were taken into account.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity, contrast and glare sensitivity, stereoacuity, and visual fields are significant independent risk factors for self-reported visual disability in an older population. Visual impairment defined by acuity alone is not the only dimension of the association with subjective disability. Additional vision measures are required to understand the impact of vision loss on everyday life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11133849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  75 in total

1.  Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device.

Authors:  L Tejeria; R A Harper; P H Artes; C M Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A utility analysis correlation with visual acuity: methodologies and vision in the better and poorer eyes.

Authors:  M M Brown; G C Brown; S Sharma; A F Smith; J Landy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Contrast sensitivity after intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy for myopic choroidal neovascularization.

Authors:  Sarah Moussa; Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei; Eva Smretschnig; Stefan Hagen; Kerstin Steindl-Kuscher; Ilse Krebs; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  False reaching movements in localization test and effect of auditory feedback in simulated ultra-low vision subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Takao Endo; Hiroyuki Kanda; Masakazu Hirota; Takeshi Morimoto; Kohji Nishida; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The relationship between better-eye and integrated visual field mean deviation and visual disability.

Authors:  Karun S Arora; Michael V Boland; David S Friedman; Joan L Jefferys; Sheila K West; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Genetic influence on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged male twins.

Authors:  Alice Cronin-Golomb; Matthew S Panizzon; Michael J Lyons; Carol E Franz; Michael D Grant; Kristen C Jacobson; Seth A Eisen; Thomas M Laudate; William S Kremen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Time-dependent effects on contrast sensitivity, near and distance acuity: difference in functional parameters? (Prospective, randomized pilot trial of photodynamic therapy versus full macular translocation).

Authors:  Focke Ziemssen; Matthias Lüke; Karl U Bartz-Schmidt; Faik Gelisken
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Vision impairment and older drivers: who's driving?

Authors:  J E Keeffe; C F Jin; L M Weih; C A McCarty; H R Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Enhanced low vision rehabilitation for people with age related macular degeneration: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B C Reeves; R A Harper; W B Russell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Longitudinal relationships among visual acuity and tasks of everyday life: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation study.

Authors:  Byron L Lam; Sharon L Christ; D Diane Zheng; Sheila K West; Beatriz E Munoz; Bonnielin K Swenor; David J Lee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.