Literature DB >> 11133597

Cardiac resuscitation after incremental overdosage with lidocaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anesthetized dogs.

L Groban1, D D Deal, J C Vernon, R L James, J Butterworth.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: There is no information comparing the ability to reverse the cardiotoxic effects associated with incremental overdosage of bupivacaine (BUP) to levobupivacaine (LBUP), ropivacaine (ROP), or lidocaine (LIDO). Open-chest dogs were randomized to receive incremental escalating infusions of BUP, LBUP, ROP, and LIDO to the point of cardiovascular collapse (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < or = 45 mm Hg). Hypotension and arrhythmias were treated with epinephrine, open-chest massage, and advanced cardiac life support protocols, respectively. Outcomes were defined as the following: successful (stable rhythm and MAP > or = 55 mm Hg for 20 min), successful with continued therapy (stable rhythm and MAP <55 mm Hg after 20 min), or death. Continued therapy was required in 86% of LIDO dogs compared with only 10%-30% of the other dogs (P < 0.002). Mortality from BUP, LBUP, ROP, and LIDO was 50%, 30%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. Myocardial depression was primarily responsible for the profound hypotension, as the occurrence of lethal arrhythmias preceding resuscitation was not different among local anesthetics. Epinephrine-induced ventricular fibrillation occurred more frequently in BUP-intoxicated dogs than in dogs given LIDO or ROP (P < 0.05). The unbound plasma concentrations at collapse were larger for ROP, 19.8 microg/mL (10-39 microg/mL), compared with BUP, 5.7 microg/mL (3-11 microg/mL); whereas the concentrations of LBUP, 9.4 microg/mL (5-18 microg/mL) and BUP were not significantly different from each other. IMPLICATIONS: There were consistent differences among the local anesthetics, the sum of which suggests that larger doses and blood concentrations of ropivacaine (ROP) and lidocaine will be tolerated as compared with bupivacaine (BUP) and levobupivacaine (LBUP). Lidocaine intoxication results in myocardial depression from which resuscitation is consistently successful but will require continuing drug support. After BUP, LBUP, or ROP, resuscitation is not always successful, and the administration of epinephrine may lead to severe arrhythmias. The unbound plasma concentrations at collapse were larger for ROP compared with BUP, whereas the concentrations of LBUP and BUP were not significantly different from each other. Furthermore, larger plasma concentrations of ROP than BUP are present after resuscitation, suggesting a wider margin of safety when large volumes and large concentrations are used to establish upper or lower extremity nerve blocks for surgical anesthesia and during long-term infusions for pain management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11133597     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  41 in total

1.  Proximal mandibular nerve block, using electrolocation, for rostral mandibulectomy in a geriatric dog.

Authors:  Alessandra M Carotenuto; Giuliano Ravasio; Diego Fonda; Damiano Stefanello
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Flip-flop kinetics of ropivacaine during continuous epidural infusion influences its accumulation rate.

Authors:  Maria Cusato; Massimo Allegri; Tekla Niebel; Pablo Ingelmo; Monica Broglia; Antonio Braschi; Mario Regazzi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  The evolving role of spinal agents in acute pain.

Authors:  James W Heitz; Eugene R Viscusi
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-02

4.  [The toxicity of ropivacaine is dose, not concentration dependent].

Authors:  M Müller
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Scavenging nanoparticles: an emerging treatment for local anesthetic toxicity.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Renehan; F Kayser Enneking; Manoj Varshney; Richard Partch; Donn M Dennis; Timothy E Morey
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

6.  Post-operative analgesic effects, after orthopaedic surgery in the dog, of loco-regional ropivacaine and bupivacaine blockade using the nerve locator technique: 159 cases.

Authors:  M P Y Dumas; G Ravasio; A M Carotenuto; S Boiocchi; A Jacchetti; V Bronzo; D Fonda
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 7.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 8.  Anaesthetic agents for advanced regional anaesthesia: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Chester C Buckenmaier; Lisa L Bleckner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  [Levobupivacaine for regional anesthesia. A systematic review].

Authors:  B Urbanek; S Kapral
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Lipid emulsion combined with epinephrine and vasopressin does not improve survival in a swine model of bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Shawn D Hicks; David D Salcido; Eric S Logue; Brian P Suffoletto; Philip E Empey; Samuel M Poloyac; Donald R Miller; Clifton W Callaway; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.