Literature DB >> 11132117

Recent advances in the assessment of aberrant behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement in individuals with developmental disabilities.

L A Leblanc1, M R Patel, J E Carr.   

Abstract

Many aberrant behaviors exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities are maintained by "automatic reinforcement". These behaviors are often difficult to treat, with the most effective behavioral interventions often resulting in only moderate success. However, a series of recent studies has advanced our ability to understand and treat these behaviors through the innovative use of behavioral assessment. We review the recent development of three categories of assessments: (a) nonhypothesis-based stimulus preference assessments, (b) hypothesis-based stimulus preference assessments, and (c) hypothesis-based assessments incorporating noncontingent reinforcement and sensory extinction procedures. We consider each category's contribution to both our ability to prescribe effective behavioral interventions and our ability to more fully understand the concept of automatic reinforcement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11132117     DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00017-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0005-7916


  10 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral treatment of automatically reinforced SIB: 1982 - 2015.

Authors:  Griffin W Rooker; Andrew C Bonner; Christopher M Dillon; Jennifer R Zarcone
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2018-07-10

2.  Identifying predictive behavioral markers: A demonstration using automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Griffin W Rooker; Gayane Yenokyan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2018-05-21

3.  Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB: A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Griffin W Rooker; Jennifer R Zarcone; Andrew C Bonner; Alexander R Arevalo
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-12-29

4.  Modeling Subtypes of Automatically Reinforced Self-Injurious Behavior with the Evolutionary Theory of Behavior Dynamics.

Authors:  Samuel L Morris; J J McDowell
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-06-04

5.  Further evaluation of methods to identify matched stimulation.

Authors:  John T Rapp
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

6.  Challenging behavior in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: initial test of biobehavioral influences.

Authors:  Kurt A Freeman; Rose Eagle; Louise S Merkens; Darryn Sikora; Kersti Pettit-Kekel; Mina Nguyen-Driver; Robert D Steiner
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Delineating subtypes of self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Griffin W Rooker; Jennifer R Zarcone
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2015-07-29

8.  Individual and combined effects of noncontingent reinforcement and response blocking on automatically reinforced problem behavior.

Authors:  Valdeep Saini; Brian D Greer; Wayne W Fisher; Katherine R Lichtblau; Andresa A DeSouza; Daniel R Mitteer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 9.  Classification of self-injurious behaviour across the continuum of relative environmental-biological influence.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; M A Frank-Crawford
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2017-10-13

10.  Using functional behavioral assessment to treat sleep problems in two children with autism and vocal stereotypy.

Authors:  Laurie McLay; Karyn France; Neville Blampied; Jolene Hunter
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2017-09-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.