Literature DB >> 11131960

Comparative safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin.

M J Wood1.   

Abstract

Although modern preparations of vancomycin are associated with a lower incidence of adverse events than the early preparations, a number of clinically significant problems remain. Consequently monitoring of serum concentrations is required. In a meta-analysis of comparative trials adverse events were significantly less likely to occur with teicoplanin (13.9%) than with vancomycin (21.9%) (P = 0.0003). This was particularly significant when nephrotoxicity was considered: 4.8% vs. 10.7%, for teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively (P = 0.0005). Red man syndrome, which may be due to histamine release, occurs after rapid infusion of vancomycin but is very rare following teicoplanin administration. In USA trials, thrombocytopenia was more commonly seen with teicoplanin administration but this was almost exclusively in patients receiving much larger doses than are now recommended. The lower rate of adverse events supports the choice of teicoplanin over vancomycin in treating infections where the two antibiotics have similar efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11131960     DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2000.11782314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chemother        ISSN: 1120-009X            Impact factor:   1.714


  10 in total

1.  Vancomycin-induced red man syndrome in pediatric oncology: still an issue?

Authors:  Tiene Bauters; Barbara Claus; Petra Schelstraete; Hugo Robays; Yves Benoit; Catharina Dhooge
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-12-13

Review 2.  Vancomycin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mehdi Mohammadi; Zahra Jahangard-Rafsanjani; Amir Sarayani; Molouk Hadjibabaei; Maryam Taghizadeh-Ghehi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Anna Candoni; Federica Pavan; Leonardo Pagani; Daniela Damiani; Marco Casini; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Tolerability and Plasma Drug Level Monitoring of Prolonged Subcutaneous Teicoplanin Treatment for Bone and Joint Infections.

Authors:  Youssef El Samad; Jean-Philippe Lanoix; Youssef Bennis; Momar Diouf; Carlo Saroufim; Benoit Brunschweiler; Florence Rousseau; Cédric Joseph; Farida Hamdad; Mohamed Ait Amer Meziane; Simon Routier; Jean-Luc Schmit
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vitro and in vivo efficacies of teicoplanin-loaded calcium sulfate for treatment of chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Wei-Tao Jia; Shi-Hua Luo; Chang-Qing Zhang; Jian-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Vancomycin-associated spontaneous cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  So-Yeon An; Eui-Kyung Hwang; Joo-Hee Kim; Jeong-Eun Kim; Hyun-Jung Jin; Sun-Min Jin; Jin-Ok Kyun; Young-Hee Lee; Hae-Sim Park; Young Wha Choi; Seung-Kwan Lim; Young-Min Ye
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 5.764

7.  Teicoplanin-based antimicrobial therapy in Staphylococcus aureus bone and joint infection: tolerance, efficacy and experience with subcutaneous administration.

Authors:  Olivier Peeters; Tristan Ferry; Florence Ader; André Boibieux; Evelyne Braun; Anissa Bouaziz; Judith Karsenty; Emmanuel Forestier; Frédéric Laurent; Sébastien Lustig; Christian Chidiac; Florent Valour
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury associated with continuous intravenous high-dose vancomycin in critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Guillaume Lacave; Vincent Caille; Fabrice Bruneel; Catherine Palette; Stéphane Legriel; David Grimaldi; Mathilde Eurin; Jean-Pierre Bedos
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Clinical Outcomes of Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Similar Success Rate, Different Incidence of Complications.

Authors:  Zhiyang Xu; Changyu Huang; Yiming Lin; Yongfa Chen; Xinyu Fang; Zida Huang; Chaofan Zhang; Zhenzhen Zhang; Wenming Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Vascular graft infection by Staphylococcus aureus: efficacy of linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin systemic prophylaxis protocols in a rat model.

Authors:  E Atahan; N Katrancioglu; Y Oztop; E Tuncer; H Ozer; S Manduz; E Engin; T D Yalta; O Berkan; K Dogan
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.