Literature DB >> 11131506

Influence of hysteresis on joint position sense in the human knee joint.

H T Weiler1, F Awiszus.   

Abstract

During muscle lengthening in a movement cycle the firing rate of muscle spindles is higher than during shortening. This phenomenon, known as hysteresis, has implications for movement control. Therefore, it should have an impact on joint position sense (JPS), the subject's awareness of the static position of a joint. JPS has been tested on the human knee joint by means of an angle reproduction test. This task included the following sequences. The leg was moved passively, by means of a motor drive, from two different start positions (15 degrees and 75 degrees) to a certain target angle and, after a time of 8 s, it was returned to the start position; subjects had to reproduce the former target angle. Several target angles, mild flexion (30 degrees), intermediate flexion (45 degrees), and strong flexion (60 degrees), were used. Depending on the start position, the movements matching these targets were flexions or extensions. At least for the intermediate position different threshold values should be expected for flexions and extensions, if hysteresis has an impact. Moreover, the JPS measure should show a dependence on movement velocity and independence on distance. Of the variables tested, only movement direction but not movement velocity or distance had a statistically significant impact on the dependent constant angle error (difference between reproduction and target angle). The target angle of 30 degrees was exactly reproduced (-0.14 degrees), independently of the start position. The 45 degrees target angle was significantly underestimated (-4.39 degrees) when matching that position by flexions (starting at 15 degrees) compared to an overestimation (2.27 degrees) when matching that position by extensions (starting at 75 degrees). The target angle of 60 degrees has been constantly underestimated (-3.80 degrees), independently of the start position. Therefore, hysteresis, the dependency of the movement's direction, neglected in the past, should be considered in future tests of JPS or studies considering the role of movement parameters for motor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11131506     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

Review 1.  The role of muscle receptors in the detection of movements.

Authors:  U Proske; A K Wise; J E Gregory
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  Interference Between Location and Distance Information in Motor Short-Term Memory: The Respective Roles of Direct Kinesthetic Signals and Abstract Codes.

Authors:  K Imanaka; B. Abernethy
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  The effects of muscle conditioning on movement detection thresholds at the human forearm.

Authors:  A K Wise; J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-09-30       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  After-effects of preceding movement on dynamic responses of spindle primary afferents during passive muscle lengthening in the cat.

Authors:  V L Cherkassky
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Interaction of the movement-dependent, extrafusal and fusimotor after-effects in the firing of the primary spindle endings.

Authors:  A I Kostyukov; V L Cherkassky
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  Kinesthetic sensibility.

Authors:  D I McCloskey
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Muscle spindle responses to concomitant variations in lenght and in fusimotor activation.

Authors:  G Lennerstrand; U Thoden
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1968 Sep-Oct

8.  Proprioception of the knee joint. Paradoxical effect of training.

Authors:  R L Barrack; H B Skinner; S D Cook
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1984-08

9.  Joint kinesthesia in the highly trained knee.

Authors:  R L Barrack; H B Skinner; M E Brunet; S D Cook
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position.

Authors:  F J Clark; R C Burgess; J W Chapin; W T Lipscomb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dynamic control of the lumbopelvic complex; lack of reliability of established test procedures.

Authors:  Marius Henriksen; Hans Lund; Henning Bliddal; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Muscle agonist-antagonist interactions in an experimental joint model.

Authors:  Andrei V Gorkovenko; Stanislaw Sawczyn; Natalia V Bulgakova; Jaroslaw Jasczur-Nowicki; Viktor S Mishchenko; Alexander I Kostyukov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual and proprioceptive feedback improves knee joint position sense.

Authors:  Timothy J Brindle; J C Mizelle; Maria K Lebiedowska; Jeri L Miller; Steven J Stanhope
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Sensorimotor function of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Neil J Artz; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.063

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.