Literature DB >> 16957945

Dynamic control of the lumbopelvic complex; lack of reliability of established test procedures.

Marius Henriksen1, Hans Lund, Henning Bliddal, Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe.   

Abstract

Impairment of the dynamic control of the lumbopelvic complex in LBP has gained increased focus both clinically and experimentally. The objectives of this study were to determine the reliability of inclinometry as a measure of dynamic lumbopelvic control. Lumbopelvic reposition accuracy during pelvic tilts was measured in 39 healthy subjects using an inclinometer attached to the skin at S2 level. The reposition accuracy was measured in sitting, standing and supported standing. Tests were performed three times with a 20 min recess between tests. Only data from the last two test sequences were used in order to account for learning effects. Intraclass correlation coefficients were low for the sitting (0.54) and supported standing positions (0.36). In the standing position, a significant difference between test and retest was observed (P = 0.003) and further reliability analysis was therefore abandoned. It is concluded that inclinometry is not reliable for measuring the dynamic lumbopelvic control in any of the test positions and prior work utilising inclinometry to evaluate dynamic lumbopelvic control should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16957945      PMCID: PMC2200717          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0198-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  Reliability of position sense testing assessed with a fully automated system.

Authors:  J Lönn; A G Crenshaw; M Djupsjöbacka; H Johansson
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Joint position sense in the recurrently sprained ankle.

Authors:  Jeffrey Boyle; Vicki Negus
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  1998

3.  The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain.

Authors:  K P Gill; M J Callaghan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Functional stability re-training: principles and strategies for managing mechanical dysfunction.

Authors:  M J Comerford; S L Mottram
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2001-02

5.  Exercise can reverse quadriceps sensorimotor dysfunction that is associated with rheumatoid arthritis without exacerbating disease activity.

Authors:  L M Bearne; D L Scott; M V Hurley
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Proprioception of the knee joint. Paradoxical effect of training.

Authors:  R L Barrack; H B Skinner; S D Cook
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1984-08

7.  Joint kinesthesia in the highly trained knee.

Authors:  R L Barrack; H B Skinner; M E Brunet; S D Cook
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Differences in repositioning error among patients with low back pain compared with control subjects.

Authors:  K L Newcomer; E R Laskowski; B Yu; J C Johnson; K N An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Injury and proprioception in the lower back.

Authors:  T M Parkhurst; C N Burnett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate reconstruction.

Authors:  D S Barrett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.