Literature DB >> 11131202

An assessment of eddy current sensitivity and correction in single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging.

M Koch1, D G Norris.   

Abstract

Artefacts caused by eddy currents are a major problem in diffusion weighted imaging. This is particularly acute in experiments in which a number of images with differing degrees of diffusion weighting and/or differently oriented diffusion-weighting gradients need to be combined. The echo-planar imaging sequence is particularly sensitive to the effects of residual eddy currents, especially due to the low bandwidth in the phase-encoding direction. Two published schemes are investigated regarding the effectiveness of eddy current correction. That of Jezzard et al (1998 Magn. Reson. Med. 39 801-12) requires the acquisition of additional experimental data in order to perform a post-acquisition correction, whereas that of Wider et al (1994 J. Magn. Reson. A 108 255-8) attempts to reduce the eddy currents directly. It is found that the latter experiment gives a somewhat superior performance and a combination of the two approaches results in an almost complete elimination of artefact. An alternative single-shot imaging experiment to echo-planar imaging is given by sequences based on fast spin-echo methods, which should be insensitive to the effects of constant eddy currents. It is shown that the intrinsic eddy-current-related artefact level in such experiments is indeed low, residual artefacts being attributed to eddy current decay during the echo train. In situations of poor main magnetic field homogeneity or large eddy currents such sequences may be gainfully used instead of echo-planar imaging.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11131202     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/12/322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Optimising diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: comparison of image quality between monopolar and bipolar single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences.

Authors:  Stavroula Kyriazi; Matthew Blackledge; David J Collins; Nandita M Desouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Biexponential and diffusional kurtosis imaging, and generalised diffusion-tensor imaging (GDTI) with rank-4 tensors: a study in a group of healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ludovico Minati; Domenico Aquino; Stefano Rampoldi; Sergio Papa; Marina Grisoli; Maria Grazia Bruzzone; Elio Maccagnano
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Quantitative measurement of cerebral blood volume using velocity-selective pulse trains.

Authors:  Dexiang Liu; Feng Xu; Doris D Lin; Peter C M van Zijl; Qin Qin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Transcallosal connectivity changes from infancy to late adulthood: an ex vivo diffusion spectrum imaging study of macaque brains.

Authors:  Yuguang Meng; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-12-22

5.  Feasibility of single-voxel MRS measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient of water in breast tumors.

Authors:  C A Corum; A D McIntosh; P J Bolan; M Nelson; A L Snyder; N J Powell; J Boyum; T H Emory; D Yee; T M Tuttle; L I Everson; M Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo planar MR imaging of normal human prostate using different b values.

Authors:  Haojun Shi; Xiangquan Kong; Gansheng Feng; Haibo Xu; Dingxi Liu; Qun Yu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24

Review 7.  DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and MRS in Cancer: Challenges and Advantages of Implementing Qualitative and Quantitative Multi-parametric Imaging in the Clinic.

Authors:  Jessica M Winfield; Geoffrey S Payne; Alex Weller; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.