Literature DB >> 11131187

The effect of statistical uncertainty on inverse treatment planning based on Monte Carlo dose calculation.

R Jeraj1, P Keall.   

Abstract

The effect of the statistical uncertainty, or noise, in inverse treatment planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on Monte Carlo dose calculation was studied. Sets of Monte Carlo beamlets were calculated to give uncertainties at Dmax ranging from 0.2% to 4% for a lung tumour plan. The weights of these beamlets were optimized using a previously described procedure based on a simulated annealing optimization algorithm. Several different objective functions were used. It was determined that the use of Monte Carlo dose calculation in inverse treatment planning introduces two errors in the calculated plan. In addition to the statistical error due to the statistical uncertainty of the Monte Carlo calculation, a noise convergence error also appears. For the statistical error it was determined that apparently successfully optimized plans with a noisy dose calculation (3% 1sigma at Dmax), which satisfied the required uniformity of the dose within the tumour, showed as much as 7% underdose when recalculated with a noise-free dose calculation. The statistical error is larger towards the tumour and is only weakly dependent on the choice of objective function. The noise convergence error appears because the optimum weights are determined using a noisy calculation, which is different from the optimum weights determined for a noise-free calculation. Unlike the statistical error, the noise convergence error is generally larger outside the tumour, is case dependent and strongly depends on the required objectives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11131187     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/12/307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Concurrent Monte Carlo transport and fluence optimization with fluence adjusting scalable transport Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Y M Yang; M Svatos; C Zankowski; B Bednarz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The effect of statistical noise on IMRT plan quality and convergence for MC-based and MC-correction-based optimized treatment plans.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser       Date:  2008-04-04

3.  Evaluation of dose prediction errors and optimization convergence errors of deliverable-based head-and-neck IMRT plans computed with a superposition/convolution dose algorithm.

Authors:  I B Mihaylov; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Assessing the Dosimetric Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance-Generated Synthetic CT Images for Focal Brain VMAT Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Eric Paradis; Yue Cao; Theodore S Lawrence; Christina Tsien; Mary Feng; Karen Vineberg; James M Balter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Review of fast monte carlo codes for dose calculation in radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Keyvan Jabbari
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2011-01

6.  Technical guidelines for head and neck cancer IMRT on behalf of the Italian association of radiation oncology - head and neck working group.

Authors:  Anna Merlotti; Daniela Alterio; Riccardo Vigna-Taglianti; Alessandro Muraglia; Luciana Lastrucci; Roberto Manzo; Giuseppina Gambaro; Orietta Caspiani; Francesco Miccichè; Francesco Deodato; Stefano Pergolizzi; Pierfrancesco Franco; Renzo Corvò; Elvio G Russi; Giuseppe Sanguineti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Evaluation of dose prediction error and optimization convergence error in four-dimensional inverse planning of robotic stereotactic lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mark K H Chan; Dora L W Kwong; Anthony Tong; Eric Tam; Sherry C Y Ng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Ivaylo Mihaylov; Yan Wu; Paul J Keall; Jeffrey V Siebers; Michael P Hagan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning.

Authors:  Jeff Craig; Mike Oliver; Adam Gladwish; Matt Mulligan; Jeff Chen; Eugene Wong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Recommended dose voxel size and statistical uncertainty parameters for precision of Monte Carlo dose calculation in stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Simon K Goodall; Martin A Ebert
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.