Literature DB >> 27277051

Concurrent Monte Carlo transport and fluence optimization with fluence adjusting scalable transport Monte Carlo.

Y M Yang1, M Svatos2, C Zankowski2, B Bednarz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The future of radiation therapy will require advanced inverse planning solutions to support single-arc, multiple-arc, and "4π" delivery modes, which present unique challenges in finding an optimal treatment plan over a vast search space, while still preserving dosimetric accuracy. The successful clinical implementation of such methods would benefit from Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation methods, which can offer improvements in dosimetric accuracy when compared to deterministic methods. The standard method for MC based treatment planning optimization leverages the accuracy of the MC dose calculation and efficiency of well-developed optimization methods, by precalculating the fluence to dose relationship within a patient with MC methods and subsequently optimizing the fluence weights. However, the sequential nature of this implementation is computationally time consuming and memory intensive. Methods to reduce the overhead of the MC precalculation have been explored in the past, demonstrating promising reductions of computational time overhead, but with limited impact on the memory overhead due to the sequential nature of the dose calculation and fluence optimization. The authors propose an entirely new form of "concurrent" Monte Carlo treat plan optimization: a platform which optimizes the fluence during the dose calculation, reduces wasted computation time being spent on beamlets that weakly contribute to the final dose distribution, and requires only a low memory footprint to function. In this initial investigation, the authors explore the key theoretical and practical considerations of optimizing fluence in such a manner.
METHODS: The authors present a novel derivation and implementation of a gradient descent algorithm that allows for optimization during MC particle transport, based on highly stochastic information generated through particle transport of very few histories. A gradient rescaling and renormalization algorithm, and the concept of momentum from stochastic gradient descent were used to address obstacles unique to performing gradient descent fluence optimization during MC particle transport. The authors have applied their method to two simple geometrical phantoms, and one clinical patient geometry to examine the capability of this platform to generate conformal plans as well as assess its computational scaling and efficiency, respectively.
RESULTS: The authors obtain a reduction of at least 50% in total histories transported in their investigation compared to a theoretical unweighted beamlet calculation and subsequent fluence optimization method, and observe a roughly fixed optimization time overhead consisting of ∼10% of the total computation time in all cases. Finally, the authors demonstrate a negligible increase in memory overhead of ∼7-8 MB to allow for optimization of a clinical patient geometry surrounded by 36 beams using their platform.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a fluence optimization approach, which could significantly improve the development of next generation radiation therapy solutions while incurring minimal additional computational overhead.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27277051      PMCID: PMC4884189          DOI: 10.1118/1.4950711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  The effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans.

Authors:  P J Keall; J V Siebers; R Jeraj; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Iterative approaches to dose optimization in tomotherapy.

Authors:  D M Shepard; G H Olivera; P J Reckwerdt; T R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation for radiotherapy dose calculation.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Xuejun Gu; Yan Jiang Graves; Michael Folkerts; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Fast direct Monte Carlo optimization using the inverse kernel approach.

Authors:  Ludwig Bogner; Marco Alt; Thomas Dirscherl; Ingo Morgenstern; Christof Latscha; Mark Rickhey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Application of an inverse kernel concept to Monte Carlo based IMRT.

Authors:  Ludwig Bogner; Matthias Hartmann; Mark Rickhey; Zdenek Moravek
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.

Authors:  Jiasen Ma; Chris Beltran; Hok Seum Wan Chan Tseung; Michael G Herman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Monte Carlo simulations of patient dose perturbations in rotational-type radiotherapy due to a transverse magnetic field: a tomotherapy investigation.

Authors:  Y M Yang; M Geurts; J B Smilowitz; E Sterpin; B P Bednarz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A new Monte Carlo-based treatment plan optimization approach for intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yongbao Li; Zhen Tian; Feng Shi; Ting Song; Zhaoxia Wu; Yaqiang Liu; Steve Jiang; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  An adaptive planning strategy for station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT): Segmentally boosted VMAT.

Authors:  Ruijiang Li; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Monte Carlo verification of IMRT dose distributions from a commercial treatment planning optimization system.

Authors:  C M Ma; T Pawlicki; S B Jiang; J S Li; J Deng; E Mok; A Kapur; L Xing; L Ma; A L Boyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  Murine-specific Internal Dosimetry for Preclinical Investigations of Imaging and Therapeutic Agents.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Joseph Grudzinski; Ian Marsh; Abby Besemer; Dana Baiu; Jamey Weichert; Mario Otto
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.316

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.