Literature DB >> 11130645

The effects of ulnar axial malalignment on supination and pronation.

M C Tynan1, S Fornalski, P J McMahon, A Utkan, S A Green, T Q Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Forearm fractures are common injuries in both adults and children. Despite efforts to obtain anatomical alignment, axial rotational malunions occur, resulting in a decreased range of motion and a poor appearance. The objective of this study was to quantify loss of forearm rotation after simulation of ulnar malunions in supination and pronation.
METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (mean age at the time of death, 79.4+/-2.8 years) were used to quantify loss of forearm rotation after simulation of axial rotational malunions of the ulna. First, maximum forearm rotation in supination and pronation was measured at torques of 6.8, 13.6, and 20.4 kilograms-centimeter applied with use of a custom jig. Following a midshaft ulnar osteotomy, a custom adjustable internal fixation plate was used to simulate axial rotational malunions of the ulna of 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees in both directions. Measurements in supination and pronation were then repeated at the prespecified torques. Analysis of variance, with a p value of 0.05, was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: In all instances, a decrease in forearm rotation after simulation of the ulnar rotational malunion was accompanied by an increase in rotation in the opposite direction. Supination and pronation were significantly influenced, whereas the total arc of rotation was not affected by ulnar rotational malunion. At a torque of 20.4 kilograms-centimeter, pronation malunions of 15, 30, and 45 degrees resulted in a mean loss of supination (and standard error of the mean) of 5+/-1, 11+/-1, and 20+/-1 degrees, respectively, and supination malunions of 15, 30, and 45 degrees resulted in a mean loss of pronation of 4+/-1, 10+/-2, and 18+/-4 degrees, respectively. The ratio of the simulated rotational malunion to the loss of motion was larger than one.
CONCLUSIONS: Ulnar rotational malunions do not lead to a significant change in the total arc of forearm rotation. Instead, loss of motion in one direction is accompanied by increased motion in the opposite direction. Even with a 45-degree ulnar rotational malunion, forearm rotation decreases no more than 20 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11130645     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200012000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  5 in total

1.  Correction of forearm malunion guided by the preoperative complaint.

Authors:  Ladislav Nagy; Linas Jankauskas; Charles E Dumont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Posttraumatic torsional deformities of the forearm : Methods of measurement and decision guidelines for correction].

Authors:  R D Blossey; C Krettek; E Liodakis
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Pro- and supination impairments due to torsional deformities of the radial diaphysis before and after ulna osteotomy].

Authors:  P Kasten; M Krefft; S Schneider; J Hesselbach; A-M Weinberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Conversion to below-elbow cast after 3 weeks is safe for diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children.

Authors:  Joost W Colaris; Jan Hein Allema; L Ulas Biter; Max Reijman; Cees P van de Ven; Mark R de Vries; Rolf M Bloem; Albert J H Kerver; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Reconstruction of malunited diaphyseal fractures of the forearm.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.