Literature DB >> 11127471

Effect of mitral valve surgery on exercise capacity, ventricular ejection fraction and neurohormonal activation in patients with severe mitral regurgitation.

T Le Tourneau1, P de Groote, A Millaire, C Foucher, C Savoye, P Pigny, A Prat, H Warembourg, J M Lablanche.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the effects of surgical correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) on exercise performance, cardiac function and neurohormonal activation.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of surgical correction of MR on functional status or on neurohormonal activation.
METHODS: Cardiopulmonary exercise test, radionuclide angiography and blood samples for assessment of neurohormonal status were obtained in 40 patients with nonischemic MR before and within one year (216+/-80 days) after surgery. Twenty-four patients underwent mitral valve repair (MVr), and 16 underwent valve replacement (VR) with anterior chordal transection.
RESULTS: Despite an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class, exercise performance did not change (peak oxygen consumption: 19.3+/-6.1 to 18.5+/-5.6 ml/kg/min, percentage of maximal predicted oxygen consumption: 79.5+/-18.2% to 76.8+/-16.9%). After surgery, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) decreased (64.2+/-10.3% to 59.9+/-11.4%, p = 0.003) while right ventricular (RV) EF increased (41.4+/-9.6% to 44.7+/-9.5%, p = 0.03). Left ventricular EF did not change after MVr (64.3+/-11.5% to 61.5+/-12.2%), but RVEF improved (40.4+/-9.2% to 46.0+/-10.0%, p = 0.02). In contrast, VR was associated with an impairment of LV function in the apicolateral area and a decrease in LVEF (64.1+/-8.5% to 57.4+/-10.0%, p = 0.01), whereas RVEF did not change (42.9+/-10.3% to 42.8+/-8.6%). Moreover, there was only a slight decrease in neurohormonal activation after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite an improvement in symptomatic status, exercise performance was not improved seven months after either MVr or VR for MR, and neurohormonal activation persisted. Compared with MVr, VR resulted in a significant impairment of cardiac function in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11127471     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01015-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  Increased oxidative stress and cardiomyocyte myofibrillar degeneration in patients with chronic isolated mitral regurgitation and ejection fraction >60%.

Authors:  Mustafa I Ahmed; James D Gladden; Silvio H Litovsky; Steven G Lloyd; Himanshu Gupta; Seidu Inusah; Thomas Denney; Pamela Powell; David C McGiffin; Louis J Dell'Italia
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Surgical Treatment of Valvular Heart Disease: Overview of Mechanical and Tissue Prostheses, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Implications for Clinical Use.

Authors:  Amy G Fiedler; George Tolis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-05

3.  Outcome of mitral valve repair or replacement for non-ischemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qianqian Fan; Xiaoguang Li; Guilan Cao; Puliang Yu; Fengxiao Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  The role of cardiopulmonary exercise test in mitral and aortic regurgitation: it can predict post-operative results.

Authors:  Hyun Joong Kim; Seung Woo Park; Byung Ryul Cho; Sun Hee Hong; Pyo Won Park; Kyung Pyo Hong
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 5.  Left ventricular remodelling in chronic primary mitral regurgitation: implications for medical therapy.

Authors:  Keir McCutcheon; Pravin Manga
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.167

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.