Literature DB >> 11127211

Quantitative ultrasound does not reflect mechanically induced damage in human cancellous bone.

P H Nicholson1, M L Bouxsein.   

Abstract

This study investigated the ability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) to detect reductions in the elastic modulus of cancellous bone caused by mechanical damage. Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation were measured using an in-house parametric imaging system in 46 cancellous bone cores from the human calcaneus. Each core was subjected to a mechanical testing regime to (a) determine the predamage elastic modulus, (b) induce damage by applying specified strains in excess of the yield strain, and (c) measure the postdamage elastic modulus. The specimens were divided into four groups: a control group subjected to a nominally nondestructive 0.7% maximum strain (epsilonm) and three damage groups subjected to increasing strain levels (epsilonm = 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5%). QUS measurements before and after the mechanical testing showed no significant differences between the control group and damage groups, despite highly significant (p < 0.001) reductions in the elastic modulus of up to 72%. These results indicate that current QUS techniques do not intrinsically reflect the elastic properties of cancellous bone. This is consistent with ultrasonic properties being determined by other factors (apparent density and/or architecture), which normally are associated strongly with elastic properties, but only when bone is mechanically intact. Clinically, this implies that ultrasound cannot be expected to detect bone fragility in the absence of major changes in bone density and/or trabecular architecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11127211     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.12.2467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Quantitative ultrasound].

Authors:  R Barkmann; C-C Glüer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Ultrasonic bone assessment: "the time has come".

Authors:  Robert S Siffert; Jonathan J Kaufman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 4.  Quantitative ultrasound: use in the detection of fractures and in the assessment of bone composition.

Authors:  Claus-C Glüer; Reinhard Barkmann
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  First meeting on bone quality, Abbaye des Vaux de Cernay, France, 15-16 June 2006: Bone architecture.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.071

6.  Non destructive characterization of cortical bone micro-damage by nonlinear resonant ultrasound spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sylvain Haupert; Sandra Guérard; Françoise Peyrin; David Mitton; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.