Literature DB >> 11125380

Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

A V D'Amico1, Y Wu, M H Chen, M Nash, A A Renshaw, J P Richie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The presence of perineural invasion on the prostate needle biopsy specimen has been suggested to be an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen (PSA) outcome following radical prostatectomy. We evaluated the clinical use of perineural invasion at biopsy for predicting time to PSA failure following radical prostatectomy after controlling for established prognostic factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective evaluation using a Cox regression multivariate analysis of 750 men with clinically localized or PSA detected prostate cancer was performed to evaluate the ability of PSA, biopsy Gleason score, perineural invasion on the needle biopsy specimen and the percent of positive prostate biopsies to predict PSA outcome following radical prostatectomy.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of perineural invasion on the needle biopsy specimen provided additional information regarding 5-year PSA outcome (82% versus 95%, p = 0.04) for patients who were in the low risk group. This difference in PSA outcome could be explained by higher rates of positive surgical margins (25% versus 17%, p = 0.07). Patients whose prostate needle biopsy contained perineural invasion and who had the corresponding neurovascular bundle resected had a significantly lower positive margin rate (11% versus 100%, p = 0.001) compared to those who had the neurovascular bundle spared. The presence of perineural invasion on biopsy was not a significant predictor of PSA outcome following radical prostatectomy for patients in the intermediate or high risk group.
CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the neurovascular bundle on the side corresponding to location of perineural invasion on the biopsy may decrease the positive surgical margin rate and improve outcome for low risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11125380     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200101000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Yi-Fan Chen; Marnie Bertolet; Elen Woldemichael; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after local treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Meng; Yan-Biao Liao; Peng Xu; Wu-Ran Wei; Jia Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

3.  Factors determining biochemical recurrence in low-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sıtkı Ün; Hakan Türk; Osman Koca; Rauf Taner Divrik; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

4.  Perineural Invasion and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Richard Flavin; Masis Isikbay; Jennifer R Rider; Travis A Gerke; Stephen Finn; Andreas Pettersson; Francesca Giunchi; Robert H Unger; Alex M Tinianow; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén; Katja Fall; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Prostate cancer at the peripheral end of prostate biopsy specimen predicts increased risk of positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Sophina Trubel; Paul Schramek; Florian Wimpissinger; Hans Feichtinger; Christopher Springer; Clemens Wehrberger; Katja Fischereder; Karl Pummer; Thomas Martini; Roman Mayr; Armin Pycha; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Intraductal/ductal histology and lymphovascular invasion are associated with germline DNA-repair gene mutations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pedro Isaacsson Velho; John L Silberstein; Mark C Markowski; Jun Luo; Tamara L Lotan; William B Isaacs; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Predictors of prostate bed recurrence on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicola J Nasser; Victoria Chernyak; Viswanathan Shankar; Madhur Garg; William Bodner; Shalom Kalnicki; Jonathan Klein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  [Histopathology reports of findings of prostate needle biopsies. Individual treatment].

Authors:  I Damjanoski; J Müller; T J Schnöller; R Küfer; L Rinnab
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Prediction of perineural invasion and its prognostic value in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun Taik Lee; Seungsoo Lee; Chang Jin Yun; Byung Joo Jeon; Jung Man Kim; Hong Koo Ha; Wan Lee; Moon Kee Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

10.  Does perineural invasion on prostate biopsy predict adverse prostatectomy outcomes?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Jonathan I Epstein; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.