Literature DB >> 11125368

Hypospadias repair in adults: adventures and misadventures.

T W Hensle1, S Y Tennenbaum, E A Reiley, J Pollard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term results and complications we reviewed the records of 42 consecutive men 18 to 47 years old (mean age 22.5) who underwent hypospadias repair between 1979 and 1999.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population was divided into groups 1 consisting of 8 patients without previous hypospadias surgery, 2 consisting of 12 who underwent 1 or more procedures in childhood but in whom local tissue was relatively intact and 3 consisting of 22 who underwent multiple unsuccessful hypospadias repairs with various degrees of penile deformity and loss of local tissue.
RESULTS: Complications were noted in 3 of 8 (37.5%), 5 of 12 (41.67%) and 14 of 22 (63.6%) patients in groups 1 to 3, including 3 (100%), 4 (80%) and 10 (71.4%), respectively, in whom secondary surgery was successful in the long term. A patient in group 2 and 2 in group 3 await further surgery, while 2 in group 3 were lost to followup. Overall primary complications developed in 22 of the 42 men (52.3%) and 5 of the 22 (22.7%) had secondary complications. There was long-term success in 37 of 42 cases (88.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of hypospadias repair in adulthood differ from the results of similar procedures in childhood. Although the various techniques are similar, there is clearly a difference in terms of wound healing, infection, complication rates and overall success. Adults undergoing hypospadias repair must be counseled on all of these variables to avoid unreasonable expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11125368     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200101000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

Review 1.  Transitioning patients with hypospadias and other penile abnormalities to adulthood: What to expect?

Authors:  Keith Rourke; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  The influence of perioperative factors on primary severe hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Alaa El-Ghoneimi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Treatment of adults with complications from previous hypospadias surgery.

Authors:  Jeremy B Myers; Jack W McAninch; Bradley A Erickson; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Hypospadias: A Comprehensive Review Including Its Embryology, Etiology and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Sattam A Halaseh; Shahed Halaseh; Mohannad Ashour
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-31

5.  Both dorsal and ventral flaps can be used in previously circumcised hypospadic adults with comparable success rates.

Authors:  Berk Burgu; Ozgu Aydogdu; Haluk Söylemez; Tarkan Soygur
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  A prospective randomized comparative study on the use of ventral subcutaneous flap to prevent fistulas in the Snodgrass repair for distal hypospadias.

Authors:  Antonio Savanelli; Ciro Esposito; Alessandro Settimi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Age of the mother as a risk factor and timing of hypospadias repair according to severity.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Jorge; Marcos Raymond Pérez-Brayfield; Camille M Torres; Coriness Piñeyro-Ruiz; Naillil Torres
Journal:  SOJ Urol Nephrol Open Access       Date:  2016-04-29

8.  Outcome of hypospadias repair in toilet-trained children and adolescents.

Authors:  Stanislav Kocherov; Dan Prat; Dmitry Koulikov; Alexander Ioscovich; Ofer Z Shenfeld; Amicur Farkas; Boris Chertin
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  A comparative study of the use of a transverse preputial island flap (the Duckett technique) to treat primary and secondary hypospadias in older Chinese patients with severe chordee.

Authors:  Da-chao Zheng; Hao Wang; Mu-jun Lu; Qi Chen; Yan-bo Chen; Xiao-min Ren; Hai-jun Yao; Ming-xi Xu; Ke Zhang; Zhi-kang Cai; Zhong Wang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Prospective assessment of cosmesis before and after genital surgery.

Authors:  N J Nokoff; B Palmer; A J Mullins; C E Aston; P Austin; L Baskin; K Bernabé; Y-M Chan; E Y Cheng; D A Diamond; A Fried; D Frimberger; D Galan; L Gonzalez; S Greenfield; T Kolon; B Kropp; Y Lakshmanan; S Meyer; T Meyer; L L Mullins; A Paradis; D Poppas; P Reddy; M Schulte; K J Scott Reyes; J M Swartz; C Wolfe-Christensen; E Yerkes; A B Wisniewski
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 1.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.