Literature DB >> 11123566

Evaluation of undergraduate medical education in Finnish community-oriented and traditional medical faculties: a 10-year follow-up.

H Hyppölä1, E Kumpusalo, I Virjo, K Mattila, L Neittaanmäki, H Halila, S Kujala, R Luhtala, M Isokoski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study focused on Finnish physicians' views of their undergraduate medical education. Differences between traditional and community-oriented medical faculties were examined and changes which had taken place during a 10-year follow-up period were also assessed.
METHODS: The study was based on data retrieved from a postal survey made among Finnish physicians in 1998. The study population consisted of all doctors who graduated between 1987 and 1996 (n=4926); those born on odd-numbered days were selected for this study (n=2492). A postal questionnaire and two reminders were sent to those selected, and 1822 questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 73.1%.
RESULTS: Physicians who graduated from the community-oriented faculties were more satisfied with their undergraduate medical education when compared with their colleagues graduating from traditional faculties. There were some differences between the universities with respect to education for hospital work. The teaching of primary health care, however, was clearly more effective in community-oriented faculties. The proportion of graduates who were satisfied with their primary care education was over 70% in community-oriented faculties, whereas in the traditional faculties it was only 35-45%.
CONCLUSIONS: According to graduates, the community-oriented medical school curriculum better meets the needs of practising physicians than that in traditional faculties. In curriculum reforms, more emphasis should be placed on comprehensive medical education, which includes both primary and secondary health care.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11123566     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00686.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  8 in total

1.  The perceptions of a GP's work among fifth-year medical students in Helsinki, Finland.

Authors:  L Kuikka; M K Nevalainen; L Sjöberg; P Salokekkilä; H Karppinen; M Torppa; H Liira; J Eriksson; K H Pitkälä
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Organizational commitment among general practitioners: a cross-sectional study of the role of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Hannamaria Kuusio; Tarja Heponiemi; Timo Sinervo; Marko Elovainio
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Status of Pharmacy Ethics Education in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Stephanie Beshara; David Herron; Rebekah J Moles; Betty Chaar
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  To determine the level of satisfaction among medical students of a public sector medical university regarding their academic activities.

Authors:  Bushra Manzar; Nabeel Manzar
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-10-05

5.  Differences in well-being between GPs, medical specialists, and private physicians: the role of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Hannamaria Kuusio; Tarja Heponiemi; Anna-Mari Aalto; Timo Sinervo; Marko Elovainio
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Evaluation of teaching effect of first-aid comprehensive simulation-based education in clinical medical students.

Authors:  Mian Peng; Ning Su; Rui Hou; Huijuan Geng; Fangfang Cai; Weixiong Zhong; Weifang Zhang; Jingxing Zhong; Zhengyue Yang; Weiling Cao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-10

7.  Graduates from a traditional medical curriculum evaluate the effectiveness of their medical curriculum through interviews.

Authors:  Simon Watmough; Helen O'Sullivan; David Taylor
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Benefits of off-campus education for students in the health sciences: a text-mining analysis.

Authors:  Kazumasa Nakagawa; Yasuyoshi Asakawa; Keiko Yamada; Mitsuko Ushikubo; Tohru Yoshida; Haruyasu Yamaguchi
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.