Literature DB >> 11121646

Which patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer need a radionuclide bone scan? An analysis based on 631 patients.

N Lee1, R Fawaaz, C A Olsson, M C Benson, D P Petrylak, P B Schiff, E Bagiella, A Singh, R D Ennis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although radionuclide bone scans are frequently recommended as part of the staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer, most scans are negative for metastases. We hypothesized that Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and clinical stage could predict for a positive bone scan (BS), and that a low-risk group of patients could be identified in whom BS might be omitted.
METHODS: All patients who had both pathologic review of their prostate cancer biopsies and radionuclide BS at our institution between 1/90 and 5/96 were studied. Gleason score, PSA, and clinical stage (AJCC, 4th edition) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses for their ability to predict a positive BS. Groups analyzed were Gleason of 2-6 vs. 7 vs. 8-10; PSA of 0-15 vs. greater than 15-50 vs. greater than 50; and clinical stage of T1a-T2b vs. T2c-T4. Univariate analysis using chi(2) and multivariate analysis using logistic regression were performed.
RESULTS: Of the 631 consecutive patients, 88 (14%) had positive BS. Multivariate analysis (64 excluded due to missing PSA and/or clinical stage) showed Gleason score, PSA, and clinical stage to be significant independent predictors for positive BS (p < 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The odds ratios were 5.25 (confidence interval [CI], 3.43-8.04) for PSA > 50 vs. 0-15; 2.25 (CI, 1.43-3.54) for Gleason of 8-10 vs. 2-6; 2.15 (CI, 1.54-2.99) for clinical stage T2c-T4 vs. T2b or less. Three of 308 (1%) had a positive BS in patients with Gleason 2-7, PSA of 50 or less, and clinical stage of T2b or less. In the subset of the same risk group with PSA of 15 or less, all 237 had negative bone scans. In patients with PSA greater than 50, 49/99(49.5%) had positive BS.
CONCLUSION: Gleason score, PSA, and clinical stage were independent predictors for a positive radionuclide BS in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. PSA is the major predictor for positive BS. About one-half of the patients analyzed were in the low-risk group (Gleason 2-7, PSA < or = 50, clinical stage < or = T2b) and elimination of BS in these patients would result in considerable economic savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11121646     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00785-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

Review 1.  Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?

Authors:  Saiful Miah; Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Freeman; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Changing the referral criteria for bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  C McArthur; G McLaughlin; R N Meddings
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Toward better use of bone scans among men with early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Paul R Womble; David C Miller; Christine Barnett; Zaojun Ye; Susan M Linsell; James E Montie; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The role of National Institutes of Health category IV prostatitis in accurately staging the newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  E Aglamis; C Tasdemir; C Ceylan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan.

Authors:  Nishikant Avinash Damle; Chandrasekhar Bal; G P Bandopadhyaya; Lalit Kumar; Praveen Kumar; Arun Malhotra; Sneh Lata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  The science and practice of bone health in oncology: managing bone loss and metastasis in patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  Allan Lipton; Robert Uzzo; Robert J Amato; Georgiana K Ellis; Behrooz Hakimian; G David Roodman; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  The use of F-18 choline PET in the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer: correlation with morphological changes on CT.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Josef Hammer; Wolfgang Loidl; Christian Pirich; Ignac Fogelman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Comparison of bone scintigraphy and 68Ga-PSMA PET for skeletal staging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Pyka; Shozo Okamoto; Marielena Dahlbender; Robert Tauber; Margitta Retz; Matthias Heck; Nagara Tamaki; Markus Schwaiger; Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  The use of F-18 choline PET in the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer: correlation with morphological changes on CT.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Josef Hammer; Wolfgang Loidl; Christian Pirich; Ignac Fogelman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Predictive value of serum prostate specific antigen in detecting bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients using bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Koramadai Karuppusamy Kamaleshwaran; Bhagwant Rai Mittal; Chidambaram Natrajan Balasubramanian Harisankar; Anish Bhattacharya; Shrawan Kumar Singh; Arup K Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.