Literature DB >> 11121213

Response of thyroid follicular cells to gamma irradiation compared to proton irradiation. I. Initial characterization of DNA damage, micronucleus formation, apoptosis, cell survival, and cell cycle phase redistribution.

L M Green1, D K Murray, A M Bant, G Kazarians, M F Moyers, G A Nelson, D T Tran.   

Abstract

The RBE of protons has been assumed to be equivalent to that of photons. The objective of this study was to determine whether radiation-induced DNA and chromosome damage, apoptosis, cell killing and cell cycling in organized epithelial cells was influenced by radiation quality. Thyroid-stimulating hormone-dependent Fischer rat thyroid cells, established as follicles, were exposed to gamma rays or proton beams delivered acutely over a range of physical doses. Gamma-irradiated cells were able to repair DNA damage relatively rapidly so that by 1 h postirradiation they had approximately 20% fewer exposed 3' ends than their counterparts that had been irradiated with proton beams. The persistence of free ends of DNA in the samples irradiated with the proton beam implies that either more initial breaks or a quantitatively different type of damage had occurred. These results were further supported by an increased frequency of chromosomal damage as measured by the presence of micronuclei. Proton-beam irradiation induced micronuclei at a rate of 2.4% per gray, which at 12 Gy translated to 40% more micronuclei than in comparable gamma-irradiated cultures. The higher rate of micronucleus formation and the presence of larger micronuclei in proton-irradiated cells was further evidence that a qualitatively more severe class of damage had been induced than was induced by gamma rays. Differences in the type of damage produced were detected in the apoptosis assay, wherein a significant lag in the induction of apoptosis occurred after gamma irradiation that did not occur with protons. The more immediate expression of apoptotic cells in the cultures irradiated with the proton beam suggests that the damage inflicted was more severe. Alternatively, the cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms required for recovery from such damage might not have been invoked. Differences based on radiation quality were also evident in the alpha components of cell survival curves (0.05 Gy(-1) for gamma rays, 0.12 Gy(-1) for protons), which suggests that the higher level of survival of gamma-irradiated cells could be attributed to the persistence of nonlethally irradiated thyrocytes and/or the capacity to repair damage more effectively than cells exposed to equal physical doses of protons. The final assessment in this study was radiation-induced cell cycle phase redistribution. Gamma rays and protons produced a similar dose-dependent redistribution toward a predominantly G(2)-phase population. From our cumulative results, it seems likely that a majority of the proton-irradiated cells would not continue to divide. In conclusion, these findings suggest that there are quantitative and qualitative differences in the biological effects of proton beams and gamma rays. These differences could be due to structured energy deposition from the tracks of primary protons and the associated high-LET secondary particles produced in the targets. The results suggest that a simple dose-equivalent approach to dosimetry may be inadequate to compare the biological responses of cells to photons and protons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Radiation Health; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11121213     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0032:rotfct]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  19 in total

1.  Dose-rate effects of protons on in vivo activation of nuclear factor-kappa B and cytokines in mouse bone marrow cells.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Paiboon Reungpatthanaphong; Louise Honikel; Adam Rusek; Sanford R Simon
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Radiogenomic Predictors of Adverse Effects following Charged Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Lindsay M Morton; Luisel Ricks-Santi; Catharine M L West; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 3.  Proton therapy for the treatment of children with CNS malignancies.

Authors:  Radhika Sreeraman; Daniel J Indelicato
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  Combined Treatment Modalities for High-Energy Proton Irradiation: Exploiting Specific DNA Repair Dependencies.

Authors:  Simon Deycmar; Martin Pruschy
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 5.  The relative biological effectiveness of proton irradiation in dependence of DNA damage repair.

Authors:  Simon Deycmar; Erica Faccin; Tamara Kazimova; Philip A Knobel; Irma Telarovic; Fabienne Tschanz; Verena Waller; Rona Winkler; Carmen Yong; Dario Zingariello; Martin Pruschy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Combining Heavy-Ion Therapy with Immunotherapy: An Update on Recent Developments.

Authors:  Alexander Helm; Daniel K Ebner; Walter Tinganelli; Palma Simoniello; Alessandra Bisio; Valentina Marchesano; Marco Durante; Shigeru Yamada; Takashi Shimokawa
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

7.  Cellular Response to Proton Irradiation: A Simulation Study with TOPAS-nBio.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhu; Aimee L McNamara; Stephen J McMahon; Jose Ramos-Mendez; Nicholas T Henthorn; Bruce Faddegon; Kathryn D Held; Joseph Perl; Junli Li; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Behavioral consequences of radiation exposure to simulated space radiation in the C57BL/6 mouse: open field, rotorod, and acoustic startle.

Authors:  Michael J Pecaut; Paul Haerich; Cara N Zuccarelli; Anna L Smith; Eric D Zendejas; Gregory A Nelson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Gamma-radiation (GR) triggers a unique gene expression profile associated with cell death compared to proton radiation (PR) in mice in vivo.

Authors:  Niklas Finnberg; Chris Wambi; Jeffrey H Ware; Ann R Kennedy; Wafik S El-Deiry
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  Alterations in glutamate uptake in NT2-derived neurons and astrocytes after exposure to gamma radiation.

Authors:  Martha C Sanchez; Abigail Benitez; Leticia Ortloff; Lora M Green
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.