Literature DB >> 11117854

Experimental evaluation of the Spiegelberg intracranial pressure and intracranial compliance monitor. Technical note.

Y H Yau1, I R Piper, R E Clutton, I R Whittle.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare the Spiegelberg intraventricular intracranial pressure (ICP)/intracranial compliance monitoring device, which features an air-pouch balloon catheter, with existing gold-standard methods of measuring ICP and intracranial compliance. A Spiegelberg intraventricular catheter, a standard intraventricular catheter, and a Codman intraparenchymal ICP microsensor were placed in five sheep, which previously had been given anesthetic and paralytic agents, to allow comparative measurement of ICP at incremental levels (range 5-50 mm Hg). Intracranial pressure measured using the Spiegelberg intraventricular air-pouch balloon catheter displayed a linear correlation with ICP measured using the standard intraventricular fluid-filled catheter (r2 = 0.9846, p < 0.001; average bias -0.74 mm Hg), as well as with ICP measured using the Codman intraparenchymal strain-gauge sensor (r2 = 0.9778, p < 0.001; average bias 0.01 mm Hg). Automated measurements of intraventricular compliance obtained using the Spiegelberg compliance device were compared with compliance measurements that were made using the gold-standard manual cerebrospinal fluid bolus injection technique at ICPs ranging from 5 to 50 mm Hg, and a linear correlation was demonstrated between the two methods (r2 = 0.7752, p < 0.001; average bias -0.019 ml/mm Hg). The Spiegelberg air-pouch ICP/compliance monitor provides ICP and compliance data that are very similar to those obtained using both gold-standard methods and an intraparenchymal ICP monitor over a range of pathophysiological ICPs. The automated closed Spiegelberg system offers practical advantages for the measurement of intraventricular compliance. Assessment of the clinical utility and robustness of the Spiegelberg system, together with the development of an intraparenchymal device, would enhance the clinical utility of automated compliance measurement and expand the range of its applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117854     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.6.1072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of two novel methods for the direct and continuous measurement of the intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model.

Authors:  Alexander Schachtrupp; Christian Tons; Volker Fackeldey; Joerg Hoer; Marcus Reinges; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Multimodal Neurologic Monitoring in Children With Acute Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jennifer C Laws; Lori C Jordan; Lindsay M Pagano; John C Wellons; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  Intracerebral microdialysis and intracranial compliance monitoring of patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kontsantin Salci; Pelle Nilsson; Timothy Howells; Elisabeth Ronne-Engström; Ian Piper; Charles F Contant; Per Enblad
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Assessing intracranial vascular compliance using dynamic arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Lirong Yan; Collin Y Liu; Robert X Smith; Mayank Jog; Michael Langham; Kate Krasileva; Yufen Chen; John M Ringman; Danny J J Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The baseline pressure of intracranial pressure (ICP) sensors can be altered by electrostatic discharges.

Authors:  Per K Eide; André Bakken
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  A New Definition for Intracranial Compliance to Evaluate Adult Hydrocephalus After Shunting.

Authors:  Seifollah Gholampour; Bakhtiar Yamini; Julie Droessler; David Frim
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-01

7.  An intracranial pressure-derived index monitored simultaneously from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Simultaneous monitoring of static and dynamic intracranial pressure parameters from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Sverre Holm; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 9.  Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement.

Authors:  Karen Brastad Evensen; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-05-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.