Literature DB >> 11117767

A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.

M A Lumsden1, S Twaddle, R Hawthorn, I Traynor, D Gilmore, J Davis, M Deeny, I T Cameron, J J Walker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, cost effectiveness and effect on quality of life of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) compared with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in the management of benign gynaecological disease.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
SETTING: Three hospitals in the West of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred women scheduled for an abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conversion rate of LAVH to TAH, complication rates, NHS resource use and costs, quality of life using EuroQol 5 D visual analogue scale, and achievement of milestones.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of operative complications was 14% in the TAH group and 8% in the LAVH group, with an 8% conversion rate. Length of operation was significantly greater in the women having LAVH at 81 +/- 30 min vs 47 +/- 16 min (P < 0.001). There was no difference in analgesic requirements between the groups although there was a significantly shorter hospital stay for those having LAVH. The rate of post-surgery recovery, satisfaction with operation and quality of life at four weeks post-operative were similar in the two groups of women. LAVH was significantly more expensive than TAH and remained more expensive for all but the most extreme scenario.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that despite the decreased length of hospital stay, LAVH is more expensive than TAH. In addition, recovery following operation and patient satisfaction were not affected by the route chosen. It is unlikely that LAVH represents an efficient use of NHS resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117767     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11653.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  16 in total

1.  Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sandhyasri Panda; Ashok Kumar Behera; M Jayalakshmi; T Narasinga Rao; G Indira
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-05-24

Review 2.  Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; David Barlow; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Liz Curr; Ray Garry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

Review 3.  Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  D Korolija; S Sauerland; S Wood-Dauphinée; C C Abbou; E Eypasch; M García Caballero; M A Lumsden; B Millat; J R T Monson; G Nilsson; R Pointner; W Schwenk; A Shamiyeh; A Szold; E Targarona; B Ure; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial.

Authors:  Mark Sculpher; Andrea Manca; Jason Abbott; Jayne Fountain; Su Mason; Ray Garry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-07

5.  The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ray Garry; Jayne Fountain; Su Mason; Jeremy Hawe; Vicky Napp; Jason Abbott; Richard Clayton; Graham Phillips; Mark Whittaker; Richard Lilford; Stephen Bridgman; Julia Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-07

6.  Economic and Survival Implications of Use of Electric Power Morcellation for Hysterectomy for Presumed Benign Gynecologic Disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Rosa R Cui; Anqi Wang; Ling Chen; Ana I Tergas; William M Burke; Cande V Ananth; June Y Hou; Alfred I Neugut; Sarah M Temkin; Y Claire Wang; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Clinical Determinants of Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions at the University Teaching Hospital, Yaounde-Cameroon.

Authors:  P M Tebeu; R Tayou; J S S Antaon; Y N Mawamba; V M Koh; J P Ngou-Mve-Ngou
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 8.  Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials.

Authors:  Claudia B M Bijen; Karin M Vermeulen; Marian J E Mourits; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Monika Janda; Katharina Merollini; Val Gebski; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.