Literature DB >> 11117764

Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition.

S D Fox1, S L Stanton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
DESIGN: A prospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology and pelvic floor reconstruction unit. POPULATION: Twenty-nine consecutive women with symptomatic vault prolapse and rectocele. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective and objective success rates and complications.
RESULTS: The mean age was 57 years. The mean number of past prolapse operations was 2.6 which included two past sacrospinous ligament fixations and 17 past posterior repairs. The mean follow up was 14 months. There was an increase in constipation from 41% to 50%, a decrease in faecal soiling from 21% to 10%, and an increase in incomplete defecation from 24% to 36% . Dyspareunia decreased from 38% to 17%, and there was some improvement in the stress and urge incontinence. There was a significant reduction of vault prolapse and rectocele (P < 0.001). All women with Stage II and Stage III vault prolapse were corrected, with an increase in Stage I prolapse from 20% to 27%. All women with Stage II and Stage III rectocele were corrected with a decrease in Stage I prolapse from 36% to 7% . The only significant interoperative complication was a cystotomy. One mesh became infected post-operatively which required removal.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacrocolpopexy and mesh interposition is a safe and reliable operation for the correction of vault prolapse and rectocele. A long term follow up is necessary to detect any late complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117764     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  20 in total

Review 1.  Management of genital prolapse.

Authors:  Ranee Thakar; Stuart Stanton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25

2.  Local reaction to the different meshes at the vesicovaginal space in rabbit model.

Authors:  Kun Zhang; JinSong Han; Ying Yao; Junfang Yang; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Kaven Baessler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-04-19

Review 4.  Abdominal sacral colpopexy: surgical pearls and outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony J Woodruff; Christopher C Roth; J Christian Winters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Sonja Brandner; LaVonne Kots; Nicolle Gygax; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-07

Review 6.  Surgery for posterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Authors:  Mickey Karram; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Rectocele.

Authors:  David E Beck; Nechol L Allen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-06

8.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

9.  Transverse incision transvaginal rectocele repair combined with levatorplasty and biological graft insertion: technical details and case series outcomes.

Authors:  G Melich; A Pai; M Kwak; S Bibi; S Marecik; J Park; L M Prasad
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Azubuike Uzoma; K A Farag
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.