Literature DB >> 11116697

New perimetric threshold test algorithm with dynamic strategy and tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in glaucomatous eyes.

H Maeda1, M Nakaura, A Negi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the time-wise reliability and efficiency of two new perimetric test algorithms, two computerised static threshold perimetry strategies, namely dynamic strategy (DS) and tendency oriented perimetry (TOP), were compared with the standard full-threshold strategy (normal strategy, NS).
METHODS: We examined 41 eyes of 41 normal individuals without any ocular disease and 36 eyes of 36 glaucomatous patients, with the NS (4-to-2 dB), DS and TOP using an Octopus 1-2-3 perimeter. We analysed test time, stimulus time and the two global indices, mean sensitivity (MS) and loss variance (LV). Program 32X was used as test grid pattern.
RESULTS: The mean test time for the NS was reduced by 52% with the DS and by 78% with the TOP strategy. Concerning the global indices, the MS value did not differ among the three strategies in the control or glaucoma group. However, the LV value was lower in the TOP strategy compared with the other two strategies in the glaucoma group. This suggested that the TOP strategy underestimated local glaucomatous visual field defects. The ability to detect early-stage glaucoma with the DS and TOP was inferior to that with the NS.
CONCLUSIONS: The DS was more efficient than the TOP strategy for the detection of early glaucomatous defects, whereas the TOP strategy required less testing time. The TOP strategy may be an appropriate approach for patients in whom time-consuming perimetry is not possible, or in whom the visual field defect is already advanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11116697     DOI: 10.1038/eye.2000.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Stabilization and comparison of TOP and Bracketing perimetric strategies using a threshold spatial filter.

Authors:  Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa; Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez; Tinguaro Diaz Aleman; Manuel Sanchez Mendez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad.

Authors:  Mark A Chia; Edward Trang; Ashish Agar; Algis J Vingrys; Jenny Hepschke; George Yx Kong; Angus W Turner
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2021 Sep-Dec

3.  Comparing the usefulness of a new algorithm to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression in glaucoma patients, in comparison to the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm.

Authors:  Hiroshi Murata; Ryo Asaoka; Yuri Fujino; Masato Matsuura; Kazunori Hirasawa; Satoshi Shimada; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.908

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.