Literature DB >> 11116377

The politics of participation in watershed modeling.

K S Korfmacher1.   

Abstract

While researchers and decision-makers increasingly recognize the importance of public participation in environmental decision-making, there is less agreement about how to involve the public. One of the most controversial issues is how to involve citizens in producing scientific information. Although this question is relevant to many areas of environmental policy, it has come to the fore in watershed management. Increasingly, the public is becoming involved in the sophisticated computer modeling efforts that have been developed to inform watershed management decisions. These models typically have been treated as technical inputs to the policy process. However, model-building itself involves numerous assumptions, judgments, and decisions that are relevant to the public. This paper examines the politics of public involvement in watershed modeling efforts and proposes five guidelines for good practice for such efforts. Using these guidelines, I analyze four cases in which different approaches to public involvement in the modeling process have been attempted and make recommendations for future efforts to involve communities in watershed modeling. Copyright 2001 Springer-Verlag

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11116377     DOI: 10.1007/s002670010141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Benchmark criteria: a tool for selecting appropriate models in the field of water management.

Authors:  Tuomo M Saloranta; Juha Kämäri; Seppo Rekolainen; Olli Malve
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  A soft systems approach to watershed management: a road salt case study.

Authors:  Geoffrey B Habron; Michael D Kaplowitz; Ralph L Levine
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning.

Authors:  Jayanath Ananda
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Water quality improvement policies: lessons learned from the implementation of Proposition O in Los Angeles, California.

Authors:  Mi-Hyun Park; Michael Stenstrom; Stephanie Pincetl
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 5.  A functional-dynamic reflection on participatory processes in modeling projects.

Authors:  Roman Seidl
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Embedding co-production and addressing uncertainty in watershed modeling decision-support tools: successes and challenges.

Authors:  Bradley L Barnhart; Heather E Golden; Joseph R Kasprzyk; James J Pauer; Chas E Jones; Keith A Sawicz; Nahal Hoghooghi; Michelle Simon; Robert B McKane; Paul M Mayer; Amy N Piscopo; Darren L Ficklin; Jonathan J Halama; Paul B Pettus; Brenda Rashleigh
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.288

7.  Involving stakeholders in building integrated fisheries models using Bayesian methods.

Authors:  Päivi Haapasaari; Samu Mäntyniemi; Sakari Kuikka
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 8.  Integrated stakeholder prioritization criteria for environmental management.

Authors:  Leah M Sharpe; Matthew C Harwell; Chloe A Jackson
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 8.910

9.  Combining Stakeholder- and Social Network- Analysis to Improve Regional Nature Conservation: A Case Study from Osnabrück, Germany.

Authors:  Felix Przesdzink; Laura Mae Herzog; Florian Fiebelkorn
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.266

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.