Literature DB >> 25999270

A functional-dynamic reflection on participatory processes in modeling projects.

Roman Seidl1.   

Abstract

The participation of nonscientists in modeling projects/studies is increasingly employed to fulfill different functions. However, it is not well investigated if and how explicitly these functions and the dynamics of a participatory process are reflected by modeling projects in particular. In this review study, I explore participatory modeling projects from a functional-dynamic process perspective. The main differences among projects relate to the functions of participation-most often, more than one per project can be identified, along with the degree of explicit reflection (i.e., awareness and anticipation) on the dynamic process perspective. Moreover, two main approaches are revealed: participatory modeling covering diverse approaches and companion modeling. It becomes apparent that the degree of reflection on the participatory process itself is not always explicit and perfectly visible in the descriptions of the modeling projects. Thus, the use of common protocols or templates is discussed to facilitate project planning, as well as the publication of project results. A generic template may help, not in providing details of a project or model development, but in explicitly reflecting on the participatory process. It can serve to systematize the particular project's approach to stakeholder collaboration, and thus quality management.

Keywords:  Functions of participation; Interdisciplinarity; Modeling; Review; Stakeholders; Transdisciplinarity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25999270      PMCID: PMC4646859          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0670-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  13 in total

1.  The politics of participation in watershed modeling.

Authors:  K S Korfmacher
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences.

Authors:  P L Rosenfield
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Challenges to interdisciplinary research in ecosystem-based management.

Authors:  Leila Sievanen; Lisa M Campbell; Heather M Leslie
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe.

Authors:  Dagmar Schröter; Wolfgang Cramer; Rik Leemans; I Colin Prentice; Miguel B Araújo; Nigel W Arnell; Alberte Bondeau; Harald Bugmann; Timothy R Carter; Carlos A Gracia; Anne C de la Vega-Leinert; Markus Erhard; Frank Ewert; Margaret Glendining; Joanna I House; Susanna Kankaanpää; Richard J T Klein; Sandra Lavorel; Marcus Lindner; Marc J Metzger; Jeannette Meyer; Timothy D Mitchell; Isabelle Reginster; Mark Rounsevell; Santi Sabaté; Stephen Sitch; Ben Smith; Jo Smith; Pete Smith; Martin T Sykes; Kirsten Thonicke; Wilfried Thuiller; Gill Tuck; Sönke Zaehle; Bärbel Zierl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research.

Authors:  Daniel Stokols
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2006-09

6.  Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method.

Authors:  Alexander I Walter; Sebastian Helgenberger; Arnim Wiek; Roland W Scholz
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2007-08-19

Review 7.  The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors:  Daniel Stokols; Shalini Misra; Richard P Moser; Kara L Hall; Brandie K Taylor
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Developing consistent scenarios to assess flood hazards in mountain streams.

Authors:  B Mazzorana; F Comiti; C Scherer; S Fuchs
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  Science with society in the anthropocene.

Authors:  Roman Seidl; Fridolin Simon Brand; Michael Stauffacher; Pius Krütli; Quang Bao Le; Andy Spörri; Grégoire Meylan; Corinne Moser; Monica Berger González; Roland Werner Scholz
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 10.  A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management.

Authors:  G Cundill; R Rodela
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 6.789

View more
  5 in total

1.  Decision makers' experience of participatory dynamic simulation modelling: methods for public health policy.

Authors:  Louise Freebairn; Jo-An Atkinson; Paul M Kelly; Geoff McDonnell; Lucie Rychetnik
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Louise Freebairn; Jo-An Atkinson; Nathaniel D Osgood; Paul M Kelly; Geoff McDonnell; Lucie Rychetnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Participatory Methods for Systems Modeling of Youth Mental Health: Implementation Protocol.

Authors:  Louise Freebairn; Jo-An Occhipinti; Yun Ju C Song; Adam Skinner; Kenny Lawson; Grace Yeeun Lee; Samuel J Hockey; Samantha Huntley; Ian B Hickie
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-02-07

4.  Simulation modelling as a tool for knowledge mobilisation in health policy settings: a case study protocol.

Authors:  L Freebairn; J Atkinson; P Kelly; G McDonnell; L Rychetnik
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-09-21

5.  Knowledge mobilisation for policy development: implementing systems approaches through participatory dynamic simulation modelling.

Authors:  Louise Freebairn; Lucie Rychetnik; Jo-An Atkinson; Paul Kelly; Geoff McDonnell; Nick Roberts; Christine Whittall; Sally Redman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-10-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.