HYPOTHESIS: Amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene in 25% of breast cancers is associated with a shortened disease-free survival. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a patient population referred to a tertiary care facility for HER-2/neu testing. The mean follow-up was 56 months. SETTING: Large, urban, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: From 1995 to 1999, a consecutive sample of 190 patients with breast cancer had tissue samples tested for overexpression of the cell surface oncoprotein by immunostaining (IM) or amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene by fluorescence in situ hybridization or both. Forty-nine subjects were excluded because they had tissue samples tested at our institution but received their treatment elsewhere. All patients tested for HER-2/neu after diagnosis with breast cancer in 1999 (n = 47) were excluded from analysis because of short follow-up time. One patient was excluded who had in situ ductal carcinoma. The remaining 93 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 93 patients, 40 (43%) had gene amplification. Overall, patients with oncogene amplification had a shorter median disease-free interval (22 months) compared with controls (40 months) (P =.003). Analysis by the Cox regression model showed that the HER-2/neu status remained significantly associated with time to relapse even after adjusting for age and tumor grade (P =.002; adjusted relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.4). No association was found between gene amplification and tumor grade (P =.98), estrogen/progesterone receptor status (P = .29 and P = .43, respectively), or lymph node status (P = .98). Seventy-two patients (77%) eventually had disease recurrence, with 18 (25%) of these recurring locally. CONCLUSIONS: The HER-2/neu oncogene is an independent prognostic indicator of a subset of breast cancers that are at high risk of early recurrence, regardless of tumor grade, estrogen/progesterone receptor status, and lymph node status. Patients amplifying the HER-2/neu oncogene have a shorter disease-free survival than patients without the oncogene.
HYPOTHESIS: Amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene in 25% of breast cancers is associated with a shortened disease-free survival. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a patient population referred to a tertiary care facility for HER-2/neu testing. The mean follow-up was 56 months. SETTING: Large, urban, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: From 1995 to 1999, a consecutive sample of 190 patients with breast cancer had tissue samples tested for overexpression of the cell surface oncoprotein by immunostaining (IM) or amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene by fluorescence in situ hybridization or both. Forty-nine subjects were excluded because they had tissue samples tested at our institution but received their treatment elsewhere. All patients tested for HER-2/neu after diagnosis with breast cancer in 1999 (n = 47) were excluded from analysis because of short follow-up time. One patient was excluded who had in situ ductal carcinoma. The remaining 93 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 93 patients, 40 (43%) had gene amplification. Overall, patients with oncogene amplification had a shorter median disease-free interval (22 months) compared with controls (40 months) (P =.003). Analysis by the Cox regression model showed that the HER-2/neu status remained significantly associated with time to relapse even after adjusting for age and tumor grade (P =.002; adjusted relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.4). No association was found between gene amplification and tumor grade (P =.98), estrogen/progesterone receptor status (P = .29 and P = .43, respectively), or lymph node status (P = .98). Seventy-two patients (77%) eventually had disease recurrence, with 18 (25%) of these recurring locally. CONCLUSIONS: The HER-2/neu oncogene is an independent prognostic indicator of a subset of breast cancers that are at high risk of early recurrence, regardless of tumor grade, estrogen/progesterone receptor status, and lymph node status. Patients amplifying the HER-2/neu oncogene have a shorter disease-free survival than patients without the oncogene.
Authors: Stefan S Bozhanov; Svetla G Angelova; Maria E Krasteva; Tsanko L Markov; Svetlana L Christova; Ivan G Gavrilov; Elena I Georgieva Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Ana P Ortiz; Orquídea Frías; Carmen González-Keelan; Erick Suárez; David Capó; Javier Pérez; Fernando Cabanillas; Edna Mora Journal: P R Health Sci J Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 0.705
Authors: Lisa M Davis; Cole Harris; Lei Tang; Patti Doherty; Peter Hraber; Yumiko Sakai; Therese Bocklage; Katie Doeden; Bryan Hall; John Alsobrook; Ian Rabinowitz; Thomas M Williams; John Hozier Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.568